Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May:62:28-35.
doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.12.012. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

A meta-analysis: Parkinson's disease and dual-task walking

Affiliations
Review

A meta-analysis: Parkinson's disease and dual-task walking

Tiphanie E Raffegeau et al. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2019 May.

Abstract

A growing body of literature has reported the effects of dual tasks on gait performance in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to synthesize the existing literature and quantify the overall influence of dual tasks on gait performance in PD. A thorough literature search was conducted, and 19 studies met the stringent inclusion criteria. Two moderator variable analyses examined the dual-task effect by: (a) mean single-task gait speed for each study (≥1.1 m/s or < 1.1 m/s), and (b) the type of dual task (arithmetic, language, memory, and motor). Three main findings were revealed by a random effects model analysis. First, a strong negative effect of dual tasks on walking performance (SMD = -0.68) confirmed that gait performance is adversely affected by dual tasks in people with PD. Second, the significant negative effect of dual tasks is present regardless of the mean level of single-task gait speed in a study. Third, dual-task walking speed deteriorates regardless of the type of dual task. Together, these results confirm that dual tasks severely affect walking performances in people with PD.

Keywords: Cognition; Dual-task; Interference; Parkinson's; Walk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Search procedure and results according to PRISMA guidelines [26].
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Forest plot of random effects model of 19 studies. Overall SMD is represented by a diamond on the bottom of the graph. SMD= Standardized Mean Difference, CI= 95% Confidence Interval, RW = Relative Weight.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Trim and fill funnel plot of the comparison for random effects model. The x-axis indicates the SMD and the y-axis shows the standard error for each comparison. The white diamond on the x-axis represents the standardized effects of the 28 comparisons (SMD = −0.68) while the black diamonds represent the adjusted standardized effect (SMD =−0.53) after imputing ten values.

References

    1. Braak H, Ghebremedhin E, Rub U, Bratzke H, Del Tredici K, Stages in the development of Parkinson’s disease-related pathology, Cell and Tissue Research. 318 (2004) 121–34. doi:10.1007/s00441-004-0956-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National I Parkinson Foundation Quality Improvement Initiative, Understanding Parkinson’s Disease: Causes and Statistics, (2016).
    1. Schrag A, Jahanshahi M, Quinn NP, What contributes to quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 69 (2000) 308–312. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morris ME, Huxham F, McGinley J, Dodd K, Iansek R, The biomechanics and motor control of gait in Parkinson’s disease, Clinical Biomechanics. 16 (2001) 459–470. - PubMed
    1. Hass CJ, Malczak P, Nocera JR, Stegemoller EL, Shukla A, Malaty I, Jacobsen CE, Okun MS, McFarland N, Quantitative normative gait data in a large cohort of ambulatory persons with Parkinson’s disease, PloS One. 7 (2012) e-42337. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042337.t001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed