Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 21:38:28-33.
doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2018.12.006. eCollection 2019 Feb.

Simultaneous stoma reinforcement and perineal reconstruction with biological mesh - A multicentre prospective observational study

Affiliations

Simultaneous stoma reinforcement and perineal reconstruction with biological mesh - A multicentre prospective observational study

Muhammad Imran Aslam et al. Ann Med Surg (Lond). .

Abstract

Introduction: The optimal method for perineal reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision (elAPE) for low rectal cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to assess whether simultaneous perineal reconstruction and parastomal reinforcement with Strattice™ Reconstructive Tissue Matrix after elAPE could prevent hernia formation.

Methods: In this prospective, multicentre, observational, non-comparative study of consecutive patients undergoing elAPE for low rectal cancer underwent simultaneous perineal reconstruction and colostomy site reinforcement with Strattice™ mesh. All patients underwent long course chemoradiotherapy prior to surgery and had excision of the coccyx. Patients were assessed for perineal wound healing at 7 day, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, perineal and parastomal hernia defects on clinical and radiological assessment at 1 year following surgery.

Results: 19 patients (median age = 67 years, median BMI = 26, M:F = 11:8) were entered the study. 10 (52.6%) patients underwent laparoscopic elAPE. The median length of post-operative stay was 9 days. Complete wound healing was observed for 8(42%) patients at 1 month, 12(63%) at 3 months, and 19(100%) patients at 12 months. Median time for radiological and clinical assessment for hernias was 12 months. No perineal hernia was detected in 17 patients following CT assessment. Dynamic MRI was undertaken in 11 patients at 12 months and all showed no evidence of perineal hernia. 3 (16%) patients had a parastomal hernia detected radiologically. No mesh was removed during the 12 months follow up period.

Conclusion: Perineal and parastomal reconstruction with biological mesh is a feasible approach for parastomal and perineal hernia prevention after laparoscopic and open elAPE.

Keywords: Abdominoperineal excision; Biological mesh; Dynamic MRI; Perineal hernia; Rectal cancer; Strattice; elAPE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a and b illustrate static image capture from the dynamic MRI videos to illustrate the reconstructed pelvic floor after elAPE. Red arrows indicates reconstructed pelvic floor plate.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Miles W.E. A method of performing abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon (1908) Ca - Cancer J. Clin. 1971;21(6):361. - PubMed
    1. Holm T. Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2007;94(2):232–238. - PubMed
    1. Holm T. Controversies in abdominoperineal excision. Surg. Oncol. Clin. 2014;23(1):93–111. - PubMed
    1. Quirke P. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet. 1986;2(8514):996–999. - PubMed
    1. Asplund D. Persistent perineal morbidity is common following abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2015;30(11):1563–1570. - PMC - PubMed