Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;1(1):17-36.
doi: 10.1002/2016GH000038. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

A Conceptual Model to Assess Stress-Associated Health Effects of Multiple Ecosystem Services Degraded by Disaster Events in the Gulf of Mexico and Elsewhere

Affiliations

A Conceptual Model to Assess Stress-Associated Health Effects of Multiple Ecosystem Services Degraded by Disaster Events in the Gulf of Mexico and Elsewhere

Paul A Sandifer et al. Geohealth. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Few conceptual frameworks attempt to connect disaster-associated environmental injuries to impacts on ecosystem services (the benefits humans derive from nature) and thence to both psychological and physiological human health effects. To our knowledge, this study is one of the first, if not the first, to develop a detailed conceptual model of how degraded ecosystem services affect cumulative stress impacts on the health of individual humans and communities. Our comprehensive Disaster-Pressure State-Ecosystem Services-Response-Health (DPSERH) model demonstrates that oil spills, hurricanes, and other disasters can change key ecosystem components resulting in reductions in individual and multiple ecosystem services that support people's livelihoods, health, and way of life. Further, the model elucidates how damage to ecosystem services produces acute, chronic, and cumulative stress in humans which increases risk of adverse psychological and physiological health outcomes. While developed and initially applied within the context of the Gulf of Mexico, it should work equally well in other geographies and for many disasters that cause impairment of ecosystem services. Use of this new tool will improve planning for responses to future disasters and help society more fully account for the costs and benefits of potential management responses. The model also can be used to help direct investments in improving response capabilities of the public health community, biomedical researchers, and environmental scientists. Finally, the model illustrates why the broad range of potential human health effects of disasters should receive equal attention to that accorded environmental damages in assessing restoration and recovery costs and time frames.

Keywords: 0400 Biogeosciences; 0439 (Ecosystems, structure and dynamics); 4300 Natural Hazards: 4304 (Natural hazards, oceanic); 4322 (Natural hazards, health impacts); 4335 (Natural hazards, disaster management); Conceptual model; Ecosystem services; Environmental disasters; Gulf of Mexico; Human health; Stress and health problems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
General schema for the overall DPSERH model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The detailed environmental/ecosystem services module of the DPSERH model.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The DPSERH model schema with elaboration of the human health module.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The overall DPSERH model, showing connections among various components. These connections are not meant to be all inclusive but rather illustrative. All arrows shown are based on existing literature or data. Different colors used for arrows have no significance other than to increase ease of following specific connections among model elements.

Similar articles

  • The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.
    Landrigan PJ, Raps H, Cropper M, Bald C, Brunner M, Canonizado EM, Charles D, Chiles TC, Donohue MJ, Enck J, Fenichel P, Fleming LE, Ferrier-Pages C, Fordham R, Gozt A, Griffin C, Hahn ME, Haryanto B, Hixson R, Ianelli H, James BD, Kumar P, Laborde A, Law KL, Martin K, Mu J, Mulders Y, Mustapha A, Niu J, Pahl S, Park Y, Pedrotti ML, Pitt JA, Ruchirawat M, Seewoo BJ, Spring M, Stegeman JJ, Suk W, Symeonides C, Takada H, Thompson RC, Vicini A, Wang Z, Whitman E, Wirth D, Wolff M, Yousuf AK, Dunlop S. Landrigan PJ, et al. Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023. Ann Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 36969097 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Conceptual Framework for Assessing Ecosystem Health.
    Harwell MA, Gentile JH, McKinney LD, Tunnell JW Jr, Dennison WC, Kelsey RH, Stanzel KM, Stunz GW, Withers K, Tunnell J. Harwell MA, et al. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2019 Jul;15(4):544-564. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4152. Epub 2019 Jul 25. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2019. PMID: 30908815 Free PMC article.
  • Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR, Alston LV, Bolton KA, Whelan J, Reeve E, Wong Shee A, Browne J, Walker T, Versace VL, Allender S, Nichols M, Backholer K, Goodwin N, Lewis S, Dalton H, Prael G, Curtin M, Brooks R, Verdon S, Crockett J, Hodgins G, Walsh S, Lyle DM, Thompson SC, Browne LJ, Knight S, Pit SW, Jones M, Gillam MH, Leach MJ, Gonzalez-Chica DA, Muyambi K, Eshetie T, Tran K, May E, Lieschke G, Parker V, Smith A, Hayes C, Dunlop AJ, Rajappa H, White R, Oakley P, Holliday S. Osborne SR, et al. Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
  • Framework for a Community Health Observing System for the Gulf of Mexico Region: Preparing for Future Disasters.
    Sandifer P, Knapp L, Lichtveld M, Manley R, Abramson D, Caffey R, Cochran D, Collier T, Ebi K, Engel L, Farrington J, Finucane M, Hale C, Halpern D, Harville E, Hart L, Hswen Y, Kirkpatrick B, McEwen B, Morris G, Orbach R, Palinkas L, Partyka M, Porter D, Prather AA, Rowles T, Scott G, Seeman T, Solo-Gabriele H, Svendsen E, Tincher T, Trtanj J, Walker AH, Yehuda R, Yip F, Yoskowitz D, Singer B. Sandifer P, et al. Front Public Health. 2020 Oct 15;8:578463. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.578463. eCollection 2020. Front Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33178663 Free PMC article.
  • Enhancing Disaster Resilience by Reducing Stress-Associated Health Impacts.
    Sandifer PA, Walker AH. Sandifer PA, et al. Front Public Health. 2018 Dec 21;6:373. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00373. eCollection 2018. Front Public Health. 2018. PMID: 30627528 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Abramson, D. , Stehling‐Ariza T., Garfield R., and Redlener I. (2008), Prevalence and predictors of mental health distress post‐Katrina: Findings from the Gulf Coast Child and Family Health Study, Disaster Med. Public Health Prep., 2(2), 77–86, doi:10.1097/DMP.0b013e318173a8e7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abramson, D. M. , Grattan L. M., Mayer B., Colten C. E., Arosemena F. A., Bedimo‐Rung A., and Lichtveld M. (2015), The resilience activation framework: A conceptual model of how access to social resources promotes adaptation and rapid recovery in post‐disaster settings, J. Behav. Health Serv. Res., 42(1), 42–57, doi:10.1007/s114114-014-9420-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adeola, F. O. , and Picou J. S. (2012), Race, social capital, and the health impacts of Katrina: Evidence from the Louisiana and Mississippi Gulf Coast, Res. Hum. Ecol., 19(1), 10–24.
    1. Adeola, F. O. , and Picou J. S. (2014), Social capital and the mental health impacts of Hurricane Katrina: Assessing long‐term patterns of psychosocial distress, IJMED, 32(1), 121–156.
    1. Adger, W. , Hughes T. P., Folke C., Carpenter S. R., and Rockstron J. (2005), Social‐ecological resilience to coastal disasters, Science, 309, 1036–1039, doi:10.1126/science.1112122. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources