Genes wide open: Data sharing and the social gradient of genomic privacy
- PMID: 30596357
- DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1550123
Genes wide open: Data sharing and the social gradient of genomic privacy
Abstract
This study reports on 13 semistructured in-depth interviews to qualitatively explore the experiences of individuals who publicly shared their direct-to-consumer genetic testing results on the platform openSNP. In particular, we focused on interviewees' understanding of privacy. Participants reported that the likelihood and the magnitude of privacy harms depend on gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, the stigma associated with certain clinical conditions, the existence of adequate legislation, and the nature of national health care systems. Some participants expressed the view that those who enjoy higher socioeconomic status or are better protected by their country's legislation have a responsibility to share their genetic data. Our study shows that people who share their genetic data publicly online-far from being insensitive to privacy risks-have a complex understanding of the social, relational, and contextual nature of genetic privacy.
Keywords: Data sharing; direct-to-consumer genetic testing; ethics; genomics; privacy; qualitative research.
Similar articles
-
Challenges of web-based personal genomic data sharing.Life Sci Soc Policy. 2015;11:3. doi: 10.1186/s40504-014-0022-7. Epub 2015 Mar 27. Life Sci Soc Policy. 2015. PMID: 26085313 Free PMC article.
-
Ethical and legal implications of whole genome and whole exome sequencing in African populations.BMC Med Ethics. 2013 May 28;14:21. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-21. BMC Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23714101 Free PMC article.
-
Key Implications of Data Sharing in Pediatric Genomics.JAMA Pediatr. 2018 May 1;172(5):476-481. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5500. JAMA Pediatr. 2018. PMID: 29554172
-
Conclusion: harmonisation in genomic and health data sharing for research: an impossible dream?Hum Genet. 2018 Aug;137(8):657-664. doi: 10.1007/s00439-018-1924-x. Epub 2018 Aug 17. Hum Genet. 2018. PMID: 30120573 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient privacy in the genomic era.Praxis (Bern 1994). 2014 May 7;103(10):579-86. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a001657. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2014. PMID: 24800770 Review.
Cited by
-
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Data Privacy: Key Concerns and Recommendations Based on Consumer Perspectives.J Pers Med. 2019 May 9;9(2):25. doi: 10.3390/jpm9020025. J Pers Med. 2019. PMID: 31075859 Free PMC article.
-
Public Attitudes to Digital Health Research Repositories: Cross-sectional International Survey.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 29;23(10):e31294. doi: 10.2196/31294. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 34714253 Free PMC article.
-
Public attitudes towards genomic data sharing: results from a provincial online survey in Canada.BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Oct 7;24(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00967-0. BMC Med Ethics. 2023. PMID: 37805493 Free PMC article.
-
Do genomic passports leave us more vulnerable or less vulnerable? Perspectives from an online citizen engagement.Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):83. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01580-7. Epub 2023 Mar 4. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023. PMID: 36909259 Free PMC article.
-
Who's afraid of genetic tests?: An assessment of Singapore's public attitudes and changes in attitudes after taking a genetic test.BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jan 26;23(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00744-5. BMC Med Ethics. 2022. PMID: 35081954 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources