Comparative study for haplotype block partitioning methods - Evidence from chromosome 6 of the North American Rheumatoid Arthritis Consortium (NARAC) dataset
- PMID: 30596705
- PMCID: PMC6312333
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209603
Comparative study for haplotype block partitioning methods - Evidence from chromosome 6 of the North American Rheumatoid Arthritis Consortium (NARAC) dataset
Abstract
Haplotype-based methods compete with "one-SNP-at-a-time" approaches on being preferred for association studies. Chromosome 6 contains most of the known genetic biomarkers for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease. Therefore, chromosome 6 serves as a benchmark for the haplotype methods testing. The aim of this study is to test the North American Rheumatoid Arthritis Consortium (NARAC) dataset to find out if haplotype block methods or single-locus approaches alone can sufficiently provide the significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with RA. In addition, could we be satisfied with only one method of the haplotype block methods for partitioning chromosome 6 of the NARAC dataset? In the NARAC dataset, chromosome 6 comprises 35,574 SNPs for 2,062 individuals (868 cases, 1,194 controls). Individual SNP approach and three haplotype block methods were applied to the NARAC dataset to identify the RA biomarkers. We employed three haplotype partitioning methods which are confidence interval test (CIT), four gamete test (FGT), and solid spine of linkage disequilibrium (SSLD). P-values after stringent Bonferroni correction for multiple testing were measured to assess the strength of association between the genetic variants and RA susceptibility. Moreover, the block size (in base pairs (bp) and number of SNPs included), number of blocks, percentage of uncovered SNPs by the block method, percentage of significant blocks from the total number of blocks, number of significant haplotypes and SNPs were used to compare among the three haplotype block methods. Individual SNP, CIT, FGT, and SSLD methods detected 432, 1,086, 1,099, and 1,322 associated SNPs, respectively. Each method identified significant SNPs that were not detected by any other method (Individual SNP: 12, FGT: 37, CIT: 55, and SSLD: 189 SNPs). 916 SNPs were discovered by all the three haplotype block methods. 367 SNPs were discovered by the haplotype block methods and the individual SNP approach. The P-values of these 367 SNPs were lower than those of the SNPs uniquely detected by only one method. The 367 SNPs detected by all the methods represent promising candidates for RA susceptibility. They should be further investigated for the European population. A hybrid technique including the four methods should be applied to detect the significant SNPs associated with RA for chromosome 6 of the NARAC dataset. Moreover, SSLD method may be preferred for its favored benefits in case of selecting only one method.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Studying the effects of haplotype partitioning methods on the RA-associated genomic results from the North American Rheumatoid Arthritis Consortium (NARAC) dataset.J Adv Res. 2019 Jan 18;18:113-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2019.01.006. eCollection 2019 Jul. J Adv Res. 2019. PMID: 30891314 Free PMC article.
-
Association of an activity-enhancing variant of IRAK1 and an MECP2-IRAK1 haplotype with increased susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Mar;65(3):590-8. doi: 10.1002/art.37804. Arthritis Rheum. 2013. PMID: 23233309
-
The chromosome 7q region association with rheumatoid arthritis in females in a British population is not replicated in a North American case-control series.Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Jan;60(1):47-52. doi: 10.1002/art.24180. Arthritis Rheum. 2009. PMID: 19116934 Free PMC article.
-
[Analysis and application of SNP and haplotype in the human genome].Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2005 Aug;32(8):879-89. Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2005. PMID: 16231744 Review. Chinese.
-
PADI4 polymorphisms and related haplotype in rheumatoid arthritis patients.Joint Bone Spine. 2012 Mar;79(2):124-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2011.07.006. Epub 2011 Oct 6. Joint Bone Spine. 2012. PMID: 21981985 Review.
Cited by
-
Unraveling the genetic evolution of SARS-CoV-2 Recombinants using mutational dynamics across the different lineages.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 15;10:1294699. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1294699. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38288302 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Peise E., Fabregat-Traver D. and Bientinesi P., "High performance solutions for big-data GWAS," Parallel Computing, vol. 42, pp. 75–87, 2015.
-
- Su S. C., Kuo C. C. and Chen T., "Single nucleotide polymorphism data analysis—state-of-the-art review on this emerging field from a signal processing viewpoint," IEEE Signal Process Mag, vol. 24, pp. 75–82, 2007.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources