Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):51-58.
doi: 10.7326/M18-1376.

PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies

Affiliations
Free article

PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies

Robert F Wolff et al. Ann Intern Med. .
Free article

Abstract

Clinical prediction models combine multiple predictors to estimate risk for the presence of a particular condition (diagnostic models) or the occurrence of a certain event in the future (prognostic models). PROBAST (Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool), a tool for assessing the risk of bias (ROB) and applicability of diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies, was developed by a steering group that considered existing ROB tools and reporting guidelines. The tool was informed by a Delphi procedure involving 38 experts and was refined through piloting. PROBAST is organized into the following 4 domains: participants, predictors, outcome, and analysis. These domains contain a total of 20 signaling questions to facilitate structured judgment of ROB, which was defined to occur when shortcomings in study design, conduct, or analysis lead to systematically distorted estimates of model predictive performance. PROBAST enables a focused and transparent approach to assessing the ROB and applicability of studies that develop, validate, or update prediction models for individualized predictions. Although PROBAST was designed for systematic reviews, it can be used more generally in critical appraisal of prediction model studies. Potential users include organizations supporting decision making, researchers and clinicians who are interested in evidence-based medicine or involved in guideline development, journal editors, and manuscript reviewers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Prognostic models for predicting the risk of foot ulcer or amputation in people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and external validation study.
    Beulens JWJ, Yauw JS, Elders PJM, Feenstra T, Herings R, Slieker RC, Moons KGM, Nijpels G, van der Heijden AA. Beulens JWJ, et al. Diabetologia. 2021 Jul;64(7):1550-1562. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05448-w. Epub 2021 Apr 27. Diabetologia. 2021. PMID: 33904946 Free PMC article.
  • Illuminating the dark spaces of healthcare with ambient intelligence.
    Haque A, Milstein A, Fei-Fei L. Haque A, et al. Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7824):193-202. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2669-y. Epub 2020 Sep 9. Nature. 2020. PMID: 32908264 Review.
  • Development and validation of a prognostic model to predict birth weight: individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Allotey J, Archer L, Snell KIE, Coomar D, Massé J, Sletner L, Wolf H, Daskalakis G, Saito S, Ganzevoort W, Ohkuchi A, Mistry H, Farrar D, Mone F, Zhang J, Seed PT, Teede H, Da Silva Costa F, Souka AP, Smuk M, Ferrazzani S, Salvi S, Prefumo F, Gabbay-Benziv R, Nagata C, Takeda S, Sequeira E, Lapaire O, Cecatti JG, Morris RK, Baschat AA, Salvesen K, Smits L, Anggraini D, Rumbold A, van Gelder M, Coomarasamy A, Kingdom J, Heinonen S, Khalil A, Goffinet F, Haqnawaz S, Zamora J, Riley RD, Thangaratinam S; International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications collaborative network; Kwong A, Savitri AI, Bhattacharya S, Uiterwaal CS, Staff AC, Andersen LB, Olive EL, Redman C, Macleod M, Thilaganathan B, Ramírez JA, Audibert F, Magnus PM, Jenum AK, McAuliffe FM, West J, Askie LM, Zimmerman PA, Riddell C, van de Post J, Illanes SE, Holzman C, van Kuijk SMJ, Carbillon L, Villa PM, Eskild A, Chappell L, Velauthar L, van Oostwaard M, Verlohren S, Poston L, Ferrazzi E, Vinter CA, Brown M, Vollebregt KC, Langenveld J, Widmer M, Haavaldsen C, Carroli G, Olsen J, Zavaleta N, Eisensee I, Vergani P, Lumbiganon P, Makrides M, Facchinetti F, Temmerman M, Gibson R, Frusca T, Norman JE, Figueiró-Filho EA,… See abstract for full author list ➔ Allotey J, et al. BMJ Med. 2024 Aug 14;3(1):e000784. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000784. eCollection 2024. BMJ Med. 2024. PMID: 39184566 Free PMC article.
  • Putting AI at the centre of heart failure care.
    Ski CF, Thompson DR, Brunner-La Rocca HP. Ski CF, et al. ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;7(5):3257-3258. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12813. Epub 2020 Jun 17. ESC Heart Fail. 2020. PMID: 32558251 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Predictive model for long COVID in children 3 months after a SARS-CoV-2 PCR test.
    Nugawela MD, Stephenson T, Shafran R, De Stavola BL, Ladhani SN, Simmons R, McOwat K, Rojas N, Dalrymple E, Cheung EY, Ford T, Heyman I, Crawley E, Pinto Pereira SM. Nugawela MD, et al. BMC Med. 2022 Nov 30;20(1):465. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02664-y. BMC Med. 2022. PMID: 36447237 Free PMC article.

LinkOut - more resources