Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1988 Nov;138(5):1185-91.
doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/138.5.1185.

Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on respiratory sensation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during submaximal exercise

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on respiratory sensation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during submaximal exercise

D E O'Donnell et al. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988 Nov.

Abstract

We wished to evaluate the role of dynamic hyperinflation and dynamic airway compression as potential sources of exertional dyspnea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The rationale was that if such factors contribute importantly, then the administration of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), which serves to unload the inspiratory muscles and attenuate dynamic compression on expiration, should improve respiratory sensation. Further partitioning of CPAP into its continuous positive inspiratory pressure (CPIP) and continuous positive expiratory pressure (CPEP) components permitted an assessment of the relative importance of the above factors with respect to respiratory sensation. CPAP, CPIP, and CPEP (4 to 5 cm H2O each) were administered intermittently (for intervals of 40 to 60 s on each occasion) in random order during steady-state submaximal exercise in five patients with COPD (average FEV1, 40% predicted) and in five normal healthy subjects. Changes in the sense of breathing effort during the various pressure applications were assessed by asking the subjects to point to a category scale of -5 to +5, where -5 indicated that breathing was markedly easier and +5 indicated that breathing was markedly harder. CPAP, when administered to the COPD group, resulted in a highly significant (p less than 0.005) reduction in the sense of breathing effort. By contrast, CPAP significantly increased the sense of breathing effort in the normal group (p less than 0.01). CPIP facilitated breathing in both the COPD group and the normal group (p less than 0.05 and p less than 0.01, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources