Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 10:4:25.
doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.05.06. eCollection 2018.

A systematic digital approach to implementation and dissemination of eating disorders interventions to large populations identified through online screening: implications for post-traumatic stress

Affiliations

A systematic digital approach to implementation and dissemination of eating disorders interventions to large populations identified through online screening: implications for post-traumatic stress

C Barr Taylor et al. Mhealth. .

Abstract

Background: We describe an approach to implementation and dissemination that focuses on changing outcomes variables within a large, defined population and attempts to provide cost-effective opportunities and resources-which might include the provision of both digital and traditional interventions-to address individual needs and interests. We present a case example of how aspects of this model are being applied to increase reach, engagement and outcomes for individuals who complete a national eating disorders screen, and are likely to have an eating disorder but who are not in treatment. We then describe how this model can apply to post-traumatic stress (PTS) and conclude with a discussion of limitations and issues with the model.

Methods: The National Eating Disorders Association (NEDA) provides online screening for eating disorders.

Results: From February 2017 through March 2018, over 200,000 individuals completed the NEDA screen. Of these, 96% screened positive or at risk for an eating disorder, and most of those who screened positive for a clinical/subclinical eating disorder were not currently in treatment. Less than 10% engaged in self-help or guided self-help online digital program, or expressed interest in calling a helpline for referral to treatment.

Conclusions: A systematic digital approach to implementation and dissemination has the potential to increase the number of individuals who benefit from interventions in defined populations. Uptake rates need to be improved.

Keywords: Implementation; digital mental health; dissemination; eating disorders; post-traumatic stress (PTS); post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
NEDA Screen algorithm and general referral issues. *, population of interest. NEDA, National Eating Disorders Association.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Arlington, 2013:338-54.
    1. Hudson JI, Hiripi E, Pope HG, Jr, et al. The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Biol Psychiatry 2007;61:348-58. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.040 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klump KL, Bulik CM, Kaye WH, et al. Academy for eating disorders position paper: Eating disorders are serious mental illnesses. Int J Eat Disord 2009;42:97-103. 10.1002/eat.20589 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taylor CB, Bryson S, Luce KH, et al. Prevention of eating disorders in at-risk college-age women. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006;63:881-8. 10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.881 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taylor CB, Kass AE, Trockel M, et al. Reducing eating disorder onset in a very high risk sample with significant comorbid depression: A Randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 2016;84:402-14. 10.1037/ccp0000077 - DOI - PMC - PubMed