Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May;23(5):623-632.
doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2675-y.

US State-Level Infertility Insurance Mandates and Health Plan Expenditures on Infertility Treatments

Affiliations

US State-Level Infertility Insurance Mandates and Health Plan Expenditures on Infertility Treatments

Sheree L Boulet et al. Matern Child Health J. 2019 May.

Abstract

Objectives We aimed to examine the extent to which health plan expenditures for infertility services differed by whether women resided in states with mandates requiring coverage of such services and by whether coverage was provided through a self-insured plan subject to state mandates versus fully-insured health plans subject only to federal regulation. Methods This retrospective cohort study used individual-level, de-identified health insurance claims data. We included women 19-45 years of age who were continuously enrolled during 2011 and classified them into three mutually exclusive groups based on highest treatment intensity: in vitro fertilization (IVF), intrauterine insemination (IUI), or ovulation-inducing (OI) medications. Using generalized linear models, we estimated adjusted annual mean, aggregate, and per member per month (PMPM) expenditures among women in states with an infertility insurance mandate and those in states without a mandate, stratified by enrollment in a fully-insured or self-insured health plan. Results Of the 6,006,017 women continuously enrolled during 2011, 9199 (0.15%) had claims for IVF, 10,112 (0.17%) had claims for IUI, and 23,739 (0.40%) had claims for OI medications. Among women enrolled in fully insured plans, PMPM expenditures for infertility treatment were 3.1 times higher for those living in states with a mandate compared with states without a mandate. Among women enrolled in self-insured plans, PMPM infertility treatment expenditures were 1.2 times higher for mandate versus non-mandate states. Conclusions for Practice Recorded infertility treatment expenditures were higher in states with insurance reimbursement mandates versus those without mandates, with most of the difference in expenditures incurred by fully-insured plans.

Keywords: Artificial insemination; Assisted reproductive technologies; Expenditures; In vitro fertilization; Infertility; Insurance; Ovulation induction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean number of visits and medication claims and 95% confidence intervals for all types of infertility treatments by health plan type, mandate versus non-mandate states. Wilcoxon rank sum P value < .01 for all comparisons between mandate and no mandate groups

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2011). Percent of private-sector enrollees that are enrolled in self-insured plans at establishments that offer health insurance by firm size and state: United States, 2011. Center for Financing, Access and Cost Trends. http://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_stats/summ_tables/insr/state/series_2/.... Accessed 21 Dec 2018.
    1. Barry CL, Epstein AJ, Marcus SC, Kennedy-Hendricks A, Candon MK, Xie M, & Mandell DS (2017). Effects of state insurance mandates on health care use and spending for autism spectrum disorder. Health Affairs, 36(10), 1754–1761. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bitler MP, & Schmidt L (2012). Utilization of infertility treatments: The effects of insurance mandates. Demography, 49(1), 125–149. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chambers GM, Sullivan EA, Ishihara O, Chapman MG, & Adamson GD (2009). The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: A review of selected developed countries. Fertility and Sterility, 91(6), 2281–2294. - PubMed
    1. Chandra A, Copen CE, & Stephen EH (2013). Infertility and impaired fecundity in the United States, 1982–2010: Data from the National Survey of Family Growth. National Health Statistics Reports, 67, 1–18. - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources