Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 8;12(9):1931-1938.
doi: 10.1002/cssc.201802645. Epub 2019 Jan 30.

Scaling Up Electrodes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting: Fabrication Process and Performance of 40 cm2 LaTiO2 N Photoanodes

Affiliations

Scaling Up Electrodes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting: Fabrication Process and Performance of 40 cm2 LaTiO2 N Photoanodes

Stefan Dilger et al. ChemSusChem. .

Abstract

A scalable process for fabrication of particle-based photoanodes is developed. The electrodes are versatilely made of photocatalytically active semiconductor particles, in this case LaTiO2 N, and optionally coated with cocatalysts and protecting components, all immobilized on a conducting substrate. The involved fabrication steps are restricted to scalable processes such as electrophoretic deposition, annealing in air, and dip coating. Special care is taken to ensure efficient charge transport in-between particles and to the substrate by incorporating conducting connectors. By adapting the fabrication steps, the electrode geometrical dimension is increased from the size of a typical lab electrode of 1 to 40 cm2 . The quality of the scale-up process is characterized by comparing the photoanodes in terms of thickness, light-absorption properties, and morphology. For several compositions, the electrochemical performance of both electrode sizes is assessed by measuring the photocurrents and faradaic efficiencies. The comparison revealed a complex upscaling behavior and showed that the photoelectrode size affects performance already on the 0.1 m scale.

Keywords: LaTiO2N; electrode area; energy conversion; photocurrent; water splitting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SEM images of a) LTON and b) LTONCNT‐composite particles. The scale bar is set to 2 μm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Lab‐size process versus scale‐up process flow. The difference between lab‐size process and scale‐up process is restricted to step 3, the annealing condition. The labelling of the electrodes indicates the fabrication route: annealing condition N means lab‐size process, annealing condition O means scaled‐up process.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Film thickness of photoanodes fabricated by the scale‐up process measured using profilometry. The black columns indicate the average thickness of 40 cm2 electrodes versus the 1 cm2 electrodes in blue columns. The thickness profiles are displayed in Figure S7.
Figure 4
Figure 4
UV/Vis transmission spectra of LTONCNT‐photoanodes fabricated by the scale‐up process. LTON spectra are indicated by black (40 cm2 electrodes) and grey lines (1 cm2 electrodes), whereas LTONCNT spectra are represented by blue (40 cm2 electrodes) and cyan lines (1 cm2 electrodes). Broken lines label electrodes with cocatalyst coatings.
Figure 5
Figure 5
JV curves of LTON and LTONCNT electrodes in back illumination a) without and b) with cocatalysts. Dark currents were added as dotted lines.
Figure 6
Figure 6
a) Chronoamperometric measurement and b) oxygen and hydrogen evolution of LTONCNT‐40‐O‐cat. The charges n(e/2) and n(e/4) were obtained by integrating the current I over time and dividing it by 2 and 4, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. None
    1. Tee S. Y., Win K. Y., Teo W. S., Koh L.-D., Liu S., Teng C. P., Han M.-Y., Adv. Sci. 2017, 4, 1600337; - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pinaud B. A., Benck J. D., Seitz L. C., Forman A. J., Chen Z. B., Deutsch T. G., James B. D., Baum K. N., Baum G. N., Ardo S., Wang H. L., Miller E., Jaramillo T. F., Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 1983–2002;
    1. Shaner M. R., Atwater H. A., Lewis N. S., McFarland E. W., Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 2354–2371.
    1. None

LinkOut - more resources