Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul;95(7):816-840.
doi: 10.1080/09553002.2018.1558303. Epub 2019 Feb 15.

Funding for radiation research: past, present and future

Affiliations
Review

Funding for radiation research: past, present and future

Kunwoo Cho et al. Int J Radiat Biol. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

For more than a century, ionizing radiation has been indispensable mainly in medicine and industry. Radiation research is a multidisciplinary field that investigates radiation effects. Radiation research was very active in the mid- to late 20th century, but has then faced challenges, during which time funding has fluctuated widely. Here we review historical changes in funding situations in the field of radiation research, particularly in Canada, European Union countries, Japan, South Korea, and the US. We also provide a brief overview of the current situations in education and training in this field. A better understanding of the biological consequences of radiation exposure is becoming more important with increasing public concerns on radiation risks and other radiation literacy. Continued funding for radiation research is needed, and education and training in this field are also important.

Keywords: Canada; European Union countries; Japan; Radiation research funding; South Korea; US.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Longitudinal trends in funding landscape for radiation research in Canada. Key events/developments affecting funding streams or shift in scientific interest are shown at the bottom of the diagram. *, the landscape reflects qualitative, not quantitative, assessment of funding sources relative to each other; no trends for absolute amounts were assessed. **, the spike reflects a CAD 50 M investment from the CANDU Owners Group toward the construction of the Biological Research Facility for low-dose radiation biological studies at Chalk River Laboratories.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A trend in the total amount of Grants-in-aid for Scientific Research in the fields related to radiation biology. Funds for research subjects under the following fields are summed: ‘radiobiology’ (1972–1992), ‘environmental effects assessment (including radiobiology)’ (1993–2002), and ‘risk sciences of radiation/chemicals’ (2003–2012). Created from data in NII (2018).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Governmental investment on NIRS. (A) Trends in the annual budget of grants for administrative expense (orange) and facilities grant (grey). Data are from NIRS (1977, 1987, 2018) and its annual project plans. Breakdown of annual budgets of grants for administrative expense in million (M) JPY in 1995 (B) and 2015 (C). (B) Nuclear energy fundamental research, safety analysis research and about two third of the radiological priority research were related to radiation safety research and radiobiology. (C) Employment expenses are included in each project in C. Data taken from NIRS (1995, 2018).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Trend in the annual amount of funding on radiobiology-related facilities and commissioned projects of IES. Amounts include employment expenses and exclude funding for radioecology.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Temporal changes in the annual budget of the MOE project.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Temporal changes in the institutional ordinary benefit received from Japanese electric power companies during fiscal years FY 2009 through 2017. The data were replotted from CRIEPI (2018).

References

    1. AEC. 2003. About the New Crossover Research. Tokyo: Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) [in Japanese] [Accessed 2018 Dec 5]. http://www.aec.go.jp/jicst/NC/iinkai/teirei/siryo2003/siryo25/siryo42.pdf.
    1. Boyd MA. 2016. Contaminated sites from the past: experience of the US Environmental Protection Agency. Ann Icrp. 45:84–90. - PubMed
    1. Braga-Tanaka I, Tanaka S, Kohda A, Takai D, Nakamura S, Ono T, Tanaka K, Komura J-I 3rd. 2018. Experimental studies on the biological effects of chronic low dose-rate radiation exposure in mice: overview of the studies at the Institute for Environmental Sciences. Int J Radiat Biol. 94:423–433. - PubMed
    1. Bristow RG. 2004. Recommendations for the future of translational radiobiology research: a Canadian perspective. Radiother Oncol. 70:159–164. - PubMed
    1. Brooks AL. 2015. A commentary on: “a history of the United States Department of Energy (DOE) low dose radiation research program: 1998–2008”. Radiat Res. 183: 375–381. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms