Contemporary Use and Trends in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: An Analysis of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Research to Practice Initiative
- PMID: 30601910
- PMCID: PMC6439629
- DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4376
Contemporary Use and Trends in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: An Analysis of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Research to Practice Initiative
Abstract
Importance: Recent data support percutaneous revascularization as an alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting in unprotected left main (ULM) coronary lesions. However, the relevance of these trials to current practice is unclear, as patterns and outcomes of ULM percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in contemporary US clinical practice are not well studied.
Objective: To define the current practice of ULM PCI and its outcomes and compare these with findings reported in clinical trials.
Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional multicenter analysis included data collected from 1662 institutions participating in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI Registry between April 2009 and July 2016. Data were collected from 33 128 patients undergoing ULM PCI and 3 309 034 patients undergoing all other PCI. Data were analyzed from June 2017 to May 2018.
Main outcomes and measures: Patient and procedural characteristics and their temporal trends were compared between ULM PCI and all other PCI. In-hospital major adverse clinical events (ie, death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and emergent coronary artery bypass grafting) were compared using hierarchical logistic regression. Characteristics and outcomes were also compared against clinical trial cohorts.
Results: Of the 3 342 162 included patients, 2 223 570 (66.5%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 64.2 (12.1) years. Unprotected left main PCI represented 1.0% (33 128 of 3 342 162) of all procedures, modestly increasing from 0.7% to 1.3% over time. The mean (SD) annualized ULM PCI volume was 0.5 (1.5) procedures for operators and 3.2 (6.1) procedures for facilities, with only 1808 of 10 971 operators (16.5%) and 892 of 1662 facilities (53.7%) performing an average of 1 or more ULM PCI annually. After adjustment, major adverse clinical events occurred more frequently with ULM PCI compared with all other PCI (odds ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.39-1.53). Compared with clinical trial populations, patients in the CathPCI Registry were older with more comorbid conditions, and adverse events were more frequent.
Conclusions and relevance: Use of ULM PCI has increased over time, but overall use remains low. These findings suggest that ULM PCI occurs infrequently in the United States and in an older and more comorbid population than that seen in clinical trials.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
Outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction due to unprotected left main thrombosis: The Asia-Pacific Left Main ST-Elevation Registry (ASTER).J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Apr;31(2):129-135. doi: 10.1111/joic.12466. Epub 2017 Nov 16. J Interv Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29148142
-
Real-World Experience and Outcomes With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Protected Versus Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Insights from the Veteran Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program.Am J Cardiol. 2024 Jul 1;222:39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.04.039. Epub 2024 Apr 26. Am J Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 38677666
-
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for ostial/midshaft lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery from the DELTA registry: a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Apr;7(4):354-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.014. Epub 2014 Mar 14. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 24630886
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 1;90(4):541-552. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26970. Epub 2017 Mar 15. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 28296170 Review.
-
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 30025574
Cited by
-
Outcomes of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Involving the Left Main Coronary Artery.Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2020 Jun 5;4(3):345-346. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2020.01.010. eCollection 2020 Jun. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 32542225 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Disease in High Bleeding Risk: Outcomes from a Subanalysis of the Delta 2 Registry.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 May 11;12(5):179. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12050179. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025. PMID: 40422950 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions by Single or Multiple Operators: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program.J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Dec 7;10(23):e022131. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022131. Epub 2021 Nov 15. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021. PMID: 34775783 Free PMC article.
-
Single versus Double Stenting in NSTEMI Patients with Complex Left Main Bifurcation Disease.J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 20;11(12):3559. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123559. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35743629 Free PMC article.
-
The Path to a Match for Interventional Cardiology Fellowship: A Major SCAI Initiative.J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 May 28;3(7):101980. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101980. eCollection 2024 Jul. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024. PMID: 39131996 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fihn SD, Blankenship JC, Alexander KP, et al. . 2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(18):1929-1949. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.017 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kolh P, Windecker S, Alfonso F, et al. ; European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines; EACTS Clinical Guidelines Committee; Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery; European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions . 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46(4):517-592. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezu366 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Brennan JM, Dai D, Patel MR, et al. . Characteristics and long-term outcomes of percutaneous revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis in the United States: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2004 to 2008. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(7):648-654. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.883 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous