Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2019 Feb 1;4(2):100-109.
doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4376.

Contemporary Use and Trends in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: An Analysis of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Research to Practice Initiative

Affiliations
Observational Study

Contemporary Use and Trends in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: An Analysis of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Research to Practice Initiative

Javier A Valle et al. JAMA Cardiol. .

Abstract

Importance: Recent data support percutaneous revascularization as an alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting in unprotected left main (ULM) coronary lesions. However, the relevance of these trials to current practice is unclear, as patterns and outcomes of ULM percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in contemporary US clinical practice are not well studied.

Objective: To define the current practice of ULM PCI and its outcomes and compare these with findings reported in clinical trials.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional multicenter analysis included data collected from 1662 institutions participating in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI Registry between April 2009 and July 2016. Data were collected from 33 128 patients undergoing ULM PCI and 3 309 034 patients undergoing all other PCI. Data were analyzed from June 2017 to May 2018.

Main outcomes and measures: Patient and procedural characteristics and their temporal trends were compared between ULM PCI and all other PCI. In-hospital major adverse clinical events (ie, death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and emergent coronary artery bypass grafting) were compared using hierarchical logistic regression. Characteristics and outcomes were also compared against clinical trial cohorts.

Results: Of the 3 342 162 included patients, 2 223 570 (66.5%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 64.2 (12.1) years. Unprotected left main PCI represented 1.0% (33 128 of 3 342 162) of all procedures, modestly increasing from 0.7% to 1.3% over time. The mean (SD) annualized ULM PCI volume was 0.5 (1.5) procedures for operators and 3.2 (6.1) procedures for facilities, with only 1808 of 10 971 operators (16.5%) and 892 of 1662 facilities (53.7%) performing an average of 1 or more ULM PCI annually. After adjustment, major adverse clinical events occurred more frequently with ULM PCI compared with all other PCI (odds ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.39-1.53). Compared with clinical trial populations, patients in the CathPCI Registry were older with more comorbid conditions, and adverse events were more frequent.

Conclusions and relevance: Use of ULM PCI has increased over time, but overall use remains low. These findings suggest that ULM PCI occurs infrequently in the United States and in an older and more comorbid population than that seen in clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Abbott has received grants from Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, Biosensors International, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Sino Medical Sciences Technology; consulting fees from DynaMed and UpToDate; and personal fees from ReCor Medical for clinical trial adjudication. Dr Waldo has received grants from Abiomed, Cardiovascular Systems, and Merck Pharmaceuticals and has received consulting fees from CPC Clinical Research for clinical trial adjudication. Dr Masoudi is the Chief Science Officer of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Dr Yeh has received grants from Abbot Vascular, Abiomed, and Boston Scientific as well as consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Temporal Trends in Unprotected Left Main (ULM) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
Use of ULM PCI over time in aggregate and as a proportion of all other PCI. Q indicates quarter.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Variation in Use of Unprotected Left Main (ULM) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Across Operators and Institutions
A, Variation in annualized volume of ULM PCI across operators. B, Variation in annualized volume of ULM PCI across operators averaging at least 1 ULM PCI per year. C, Variation in annualized volume of ULM PCI across institutions. D, Variation in annualized volume of ULM PCI across institutions averaging at least 1 ULM PCI per year.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fihn SD, Blankenship JC, Alexander KP, et al. . 2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(18):1929-1949. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kolh P, Windecker S, Alfonso F, et al. ; European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines; EACTS Clinical Guidelines Committee; Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery; European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions . 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46(4):517-592. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezu366 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McNulty EJ, Ng W, Spertus JA, et al. . Surgical candidacy and selection biases in nonemergent left main stenting: implications for observational studies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(9):1020-1027. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2011.06.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brennan JM, Dai D, Patel MR, et al. . Characteristics and long-term outcomes of percutaneous revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis in the United States: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2004 to 2008. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(7):648-654. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.883 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cavalcante R, Sotomi Y, Lee CW, et al. . Outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery in patients with unprotected left main disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(10):999-1009. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.024 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms