Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun;18(2):295-303.
doi: 10.4314/ahs.v18i2.14.

Diagnostic utility of, and influence of tobacco usage and genetic predisposition on, immunoglobulin A, rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated peptide auto-antibodies in South African rheumatoid arthritis patients

Affiliations

Diagnostic utility of, and influence of tobacco usage and genetic predisposition on, immunoglobulin A, rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated peptide auto-antibodies in South African rheumatoid arthritis patients

Pieter Meyer et al. Afr Health Sci. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The immunoglobulin A isotypes of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor (RF) are associated with disease severity and progression in Caucasian rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, as well as with genetic predisposition and tobacco use.

Objectives: To compare levels of ACPA-IgA and RF-IgA with those of ACPA-IgG and cRF in a cohort of black South African RA patients and healthy controls.To investigate the relationship between IGA autoantibodies and disease severity, genetic predisposition and tobacco use.

Methods: RF-IgA and ACPA-IgA were determined in a cohort of predominantly black South African RA patients (n=75) in relation to serodiagnostic and prognostic potential, as well as tobacco use and genetic predisposition. Healthy control subjects were included to determine sensitivity, specificity and predictive values.ACPA-IgG/IgA and RF-IgA were determined by enzyme immunoassay and hs-CRP and cRF by nephelometry. Cotinine levels were determined by ELISA.

Results: The frequencies of ACPA-IgA and RF-IgA were 31% and 88% respectively compared to 88% for both types of traditional autoantibody procedures. ACPA-IgA was significantly higher (p=0.007) in patients with short disease duration, while linear regression analysis revealed a positive relationship with baseline disease activity scores. Levels of ACPA-IgG and ACPA-IgA were significantly higher in tobacco users who carried the HLA shared epitope.

Conclusion: Although lacking in serodiagnostic superiority over cRF and ACPA-IgG, inclusion of RF-IgA and ACPA-IgA in autoantibody panels may provide insights into disease pathogenesis, interactions between tobacco usage and HLA genotype in the production of potentially disease-triggering ACPA-IgA antibodies.

Keywords: South Africa; Tobacco usage; anti-citrullinated peptide; genetic predisposition; immunoglobulin A; rheumatoid arthritis patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Venn diagram of positive reactivity patterns of ACPA-IgG, cRF, ACPA-IgA RF-IgA individually as well as cross-reactivity patterns between these biomarkers. The Venn diagram indicates that 31% (n=23) of RA patients had cRF and ACPA autoantibodies of both serotypes (IgG and IgA), while 48% (n=36) were positive for ACPA-IgG, cRF and RF-IgA, but not for ACPA-IgA.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Median values of ACPA, and ACPA-IgA in patients categorised according to HLA-SE homozygosity (SS) and heterozygosity (SX). Values were standardised (z-scores) to display on common y-axis (standardisation: x* = (x-m)/SD Where m is the mean of x, and SD is the standard deviation of x).
Figure 3A
Figure 3A
Median ACPA-IgA values in RA tobacco users and non-users showing a trend towards higher ACPA-IgA titres in users of tobacco.
Figure 3B
Figure 3B
Median ACPA-IgA values in tobacco users and non-users categorised according to Shared Epitope homozygosity (SS) and heterozygosity (SX).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO, 3rd, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(9):2569–2581. - PubMed
    1. Aggarwal R, Liao K, Nair R, Ringold S, Costenbader KH. Anti-citrullinated peptide antibody assays and their role in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(11):1472–1483. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deane KD. Preclinical rheumatoid arthritis (autoantibodies): an updated review. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2014;16(5):419. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hu ZD, Deng AM. Auto-antibodies in pre-clinical autoimmune disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;437:14–18. - PubMed
    1. Meyer PW, Ally MM, Anderson R. Reliable and cost-effective serodiagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2016;36(6):751–758. - PubMed

MeSH terms