Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 7;7(4):287-298.
doi: 10.1007/s13534-017-0036-1. eCollection 2017 Nov.

Real-time biofeedback device for gait rehabilitation of post-stroke patients

Affiliations

Real-time biofeedback device for gait rehabilitation of post-stroke patients

I-Hung Khoo et al. Biomed Eng Lett. .

Abstract

In this work, we develop a device, called 'Walk-Even', that can provide real-time feedback to correct gait asymmetry commonly exhibited in post-stroke survivors and persons with certain neurological disorders. The device computes gait parameters, including gait time, swing time, and stance time of each leg, to detect gait asymmetry and provide corresponding real-time biofeedback by means of auditory and electrotactile stimulation to actively correct the user's gait. The system consists of customized force-sensor-embedded insoles adjustable to fit any shoe size, electrotactile and auditory feedback circuits, microcontroller, and wireless XBee transceivers. The device also offers data saving capability. To validate its accuracy and reliability, we compared the gait measurements from our device with a commercial gait and balance assessment device, Zeno Walkway. The results show good correlation and agreement in a validity study with six healthy subjects and reliability study with seventeen healthy subjects. In addition, preliminary testing on six post-stroke patients after an 8-week training shows that the Walk-Even device helps to improve gait symmetry, foot pressure and forefoot loading of the affected side. Thus, initial testing indicates that the device is accurate in measuring the gait parameters and effective in improving gait symmetry using real-time feedback. The device is portable and low cost and has the potential for use in a non-clinical setting for patients that can walk independently without assistance. A more extensive testing with stroke patients is still ongoing.

Keywords: Biofeedback; Gait asymmetry; Rehabilitation; Stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors (I-Hung Khoo, Panadda Marayong, Vennila Krishnan, Michael Balagtas, Omar Rojas, Katherine Leyba) declare that they have no conflict of interests in relation to the work in this article.Approval was obtained from the CSULB Institutional Review Board for the experiment involving human subjects.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Block diagram of device
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Device component placement on patient
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Flowcharts describing a Swing Feedback, b Stance Feedback
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a Sandals with custom force sensing insoles. b Locations of FSRs on the insole
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Force sensor interface circuit
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Boost converter circuit
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Output voltage across a 500 Ω test load at 80 μs pulse width
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Graphical user interface running on PC
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Complete device circuitry
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Walk-Even device worn by a post-stroke patient during the training
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Sample force readings in pounds recorded by the device for the left leg (red heel, blue toe). (Color figure online)
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
Gait parameters calculation using predetermined thresholds
Fig. 13
Fig. 13
Bland–Altman plots for normal walking condition: a gait time, b swing time, c stance time
Fig. 14
Fig. 14
Bland–Altman plots for asymmetric walking condition: a gait time, b swing time, c stance time
Fig. 15
Fig. 15
Asymmetry ratio progression (with SD error bars) for six test subjects. Subjects 1 and 2 receive Stance Feedback, subjects 3 and 4 receive Swing Feedback, subjects 5 and 6 are Control
Fig. 16
Fig. 16
Affected side foot pressure for six test subjects, pre- and post-intervention measured with Tekscan F-scan
Fig. 17
Fig. 17
Sample of heel and metatarsal (forefoot) forces of the affected side across the normalized gait cycle, pre- and post-intervention of one subject measured with Tekscan F-scan
Fig. 18
Fig. 18
Heel to forefoot transfer points for the six subjects, pre- and post-intervention measured with Tekscan F-scan. Note that the lesser values in post-intervention indicate earlier transfer of body weight from heel to forefoot

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mun BM, Kim TH, Lee JH, Lim JY, Seo DK, Lee DJ. Comparison of gait aspects according to FES stimulation position applied to stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26:563–566. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.563. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Quervain IA, Simon SR, Leurgans S, Pease WS, McAllister D. Gait pattern in the early recovery period after stroke. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1506–1514. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199610000-00008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Awad LN, Palmer JA, Pohlig RT, Binder-Macleod SA, Reisman DS. Walking speed and step length asymmetry modify the energy cost of walking after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29:416–423. doi: 10.1177/1545968314552528. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eng JJ, Tang PF. Gait training strategies to optimize walking ability in people with stroke: a synthesis of the evidence. Expert Rev Neurother. 2007;7:1417–1436. doi: 10.1586/14737175.7.10.1417. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim SY, Yang L, Park IJ, Kim EJ, Park MS, You SH, Kim YH, Ko HY, Shin YI. Correction to “Effects of Innovative WALKBOT Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training on Balance and Gait Recovery in Hemiparetic Stroke: a Prospective, Randomized, Experimenter Blinded Case Control Study With a Four-Week Follow-Up”. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2015;23:1128. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2497058. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources