Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec 17;13(6):677-683.
doi: 10.1007/s13770-016-0128-5. eCollection 2016 Dec.

Distinguishing tendon and ligament fibroblasts based on 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Affiliations

Distinguishing tendon and ligament fibroblasts based on 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Hun Yeong Ban et al. Tissue Eng Regen Med. .

Abstract

Tendon and ligament (T/L) have been known to be obviously different from each other in tissue level. However, due to the overlapping gene markers, distinction in cellular level has not been clearly verified yet. Recently, the use of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy has shown the potential to detect biological markers in cellular level. Therefore, in this study we applied a non-invasive technique based on NMR spectroscopy to establish biomarkers to distinguish between T/L fibroblasts. In addition the cellular morphologies and gene expression patterns were also investigated for comparison through optical microscopy and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). No difference was observed from morphology and real-time PCR results, either as expected. However, we found clear differences in their metabolomic spectra using 1H NMR spectroscopy. The calculated integral values of fatty acids (with chemical shifts at ~0.9, 1.26, 1.59, 2.05, 2.25, and 2.81 ppm), lactate (~1.33 ppm), and leucine (~2.72 ppm) were significantly different between the two types of fibroblasts. To be specific tendon group exhibited higher level of the metabolite than ligament group. In conclusion, in-cell metabolomic evaluation by NMR technique used in this study is believed to provide a promising tool in distinguishing cell types, especially T/L cells, which cannot be classified by conventional biological assays.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Ligament; Metabolomic evaluation; Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Tendon.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Lomas AJ, Ryan CN, Sorushanova A, Shologu N, Sideri AI, Tsioli V, et al. The past, present and future in scaffold-based tendon treatments. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;84:257–277. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.11.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen B, Ding J, Zhang W, Zhou G, Cao Y, Liu W, et al. Tissue engineering of tendons: a comparison of muscle-derived cells, tenocytes, and dermal fibroblasts as cell sources. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:536. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000479980.83169.31. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jung HJ, Fisher MB, Woo SL. Role of biomechanics in the understanding of normal, injured, and healing ligaments and tendons. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2009;1:9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rodrigues MT, Reis RL, Gomes ME. Engineering tendon and ligament tissues: present developments towards successful clinical products. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2013;7:673–686. doi: 10.1002/term.1459. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rumian AP, Wallace AL, Birch HL. Tendons and ligaments are anatomically distinct but overlap in molecular and morphological features—a comparative study in an ovine model. J Orthop Res. 2007;25:458–464. doi: 10.1002/jor.20218. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources