Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Mar;27(3):745-761.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4556-8. Epub 2019 Jan 2.

Association between dyadic interventions and outcomes in cancer patients: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Association between dyadic interventions and outcomes in cancer patients: a meta-analysis

Yanli Hu et al. Support Care Cancer. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: Patient-caregiver dyadic interventions are when "interventions are offered to cancer patients and their family caregivers together as the unit of care." The purpose of the present study was to determine the association of dyadic intervention for cancer patients and their family caregivers with quality of life (QOL), and other outcomes for people with cancer.

Methods: Literature searches were conducted using the electronic databases to identify all randomized clinical trials on cancer patient-caregiver dyads. Meta-analysis was used to analyze data.

Results: Twenty-three RCTs provided data on 2317 patient-caregiver dyads. In the meta-analysis, at the 0- to 3-month follow-up, dyadic intervention was associated with statistically and clinically significant improvements in patient total QOL (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.50); the total spiritual aspect of QOL (SMD, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.06-0.50); the emotional (SMD, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.02-0.29), social (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07-0.36), and mental (SMD, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.07-0.46) aspects of QOL; depression (SMD, - 0.35; 95% CI, - 0.65 to - 0.05); anxiety (SMD, - 0.42; 95% CI, - 0.70 to - 0.13); relatedness (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.32); and marital functioning (SMD, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.05-1.97). At the 3.1- to 6-month follow-up, dyadic intervention was associated with significant improvements in patient social aspect (SMD, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.03-0.35) and depression (SMD, - 0.29; 95% CI, - 0.56 to - 0.03). There was no association between dyadic interventions and the patient functional and physical aspects of QOL. Dyadic intervention was associated consistently with no improvements in hopelessness, pain, fatigue, and survival.

Conclusions: In this review, dyadic interventions for caregivers and cancer patients were associated with improvements in multiple psychosocial aspects of patient outcomes.

Keywords: Cancer patient; Caregiver; Dyads; Meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Psychooncology. 2005 Jun;14(6):478-91 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 2007 Dec 15;110(12):2809-18 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64 - PubMed
    1. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Aug;40(2):224-34 - PubMed
    1. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):317-39 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources