Functional and aesthetic results after septorhinoplasty and concomitant radiofrequency of the inferior turbinate: is there a role for patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)?
- PMID: 30604059
- DOI: 10.1007/s00405-018-05269-5
Functional and aesthetic results after septorhinoplasty and concomitant radiofrequency of the inferior turbinate: is there a role for patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)?
Abstract
Purpose: Functional and aesthetic results after septorhinoplasty (SRP) are often not clearly demonstrated. There is still an open topic in the literature about analysis of aesthetic, functional results and patients' satisfaction after SRP. The aim of our study is to determine patients' satisfaction after SRP and concomitant radiofrequency of the inferior turbinate (RF) regarding nose appearance and improvement of symptoms, using patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).
Methods: ROE questionnaire and the NOSE scale were used for a retrospective evaluation to assess patient's satisfaction in 369 patients undergoing SRP surgery from 2003 to 2016. Two additional questions were asked to confirm satisfaction following surgery.
Results: 258 patients completed the questionnaires (71.7%). The global average ROE score was 18.14 (75.6%). The percentage of satisfaction of aesthetic result was 87.3%, in particular 10.5% were very happy, 57% very much satisfied and 19.8% moderately satisfied. The global post-operative average NOSE score was 13.1 with the resolution of nasal obstruction in 72.1% cases and a marked improvement in 9.3%. The results of the two additional questions showed that 81% of patients would undergo the procedure again if required and 72.1% of patients were globally satisfied.
Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the utility of PROMs in evaluating aesthetic and functional results after SRP and simultaneous RF. In our series, the patients undergoing SRP and RF are generally satisfied by the functional and aesthetic results. This kind of assessments should be the most common post-operative evaluation methods in this surgery.
Keywords: NOSE scale; PROMs; ROE questionnaire; Septorhinoplasty.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of Patient Satisfaction With Evaluation Methods in Open Technique Septorhinoplasty.J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Mar;27(2):420-4. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002321. J Craniofac Surg. 2016. PMID: 26967078
-
Improvement in nasal obstruction and quality of life after septorhinoplasty and turbinate surgery.Laryngoscope. 2019 Jul;129(7):1554-1560. doi: 10.1002/lary.27859. Epub 2019 Feb 27. Laryngoscope. 2019. PMID: 30810237
-
Evaluation of functional and aesthetic outcomes following open technique septorhinoplasty: assessing the utility and correlation of the Rhinoplasty Health Inventory and Nasal Outcomes, Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation, and Nasal Obstructive Symptom Evaluation questionnaires.Acta Otolaryngol. 2025 May;145(5):443-449. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2025.2477210. Epub 2025 Mar 13. Acta Otolaryngol. 2025. PMID: 40079098
-
Functional/Aesthetic Measures of Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A Review.Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Sep 13;39(10):1057-1062. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz029. Aesthet Surg J. 2019. PMID: 30722008 Review.
-
The Inferior Turbinate in Rhinoplasty.Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2017 May;25(2):171-177. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Feb 21. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2017. PMID: 28340648 Review.
Cited by
-
Change in surgeon for revision rhinoplasty: The impact of patient demographics and surgical technique on patient retention.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020 Nov 12;5(6):1044-1049. doi: 10.1002/lio2.496. eCollection 2020 Dec. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020. PMID: 33364392 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources