Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;33(10):3361-3369.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06629-2. Epub 2019 Jan 2.

Laparoscopic IPOM versus open sublay technique for elective incisional hernia repair: a registry-based, propensity score-matched comparison of 9907 patients

Affiliations

Laparoscopic IPOM versus open sublay technique for elective incisional hernia repair: a registry-based, propensity score-matched comparison of 9907 patients

F Köckerling et al. Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Background: For comparison of laparoscopic IPOM versus sublay technique for elective incisional hernia repair, the number of cases included in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses is limited. Therefore, an urgent need for more comparative data persists.

Methods: In total, 9907 patients with an elective incisional hernia repair and 1-year follow-up were selected from the Herniamed Hernia Registry between September 1, 2009 and June 1, 2016. Using propensity score matching, 3965 (96.5%) matched pairs from 4110 laparoscopic IPOM and 5797 sublay operations were formed for comparison of the techniques.

Results: Comparison of laparoscopic IPOM versus open sublay revealed disadvantages for the sublay operation regarding postoperative surgical complications (3.4% vs. 10.5%; p < 0.001), complication-related reoperations (1.5% vs. 4.7%; p < 0.001), and postoperative general complications (2.5% vs. 3.7%; p = 0.004). The majority of surgical postoperative complications were surgical site infection, seroma, and bleeding. Laparoscopic IPOM had disadvantages in terms of intraoperative complications (2.3% vs. 1.3%; p < 0.001), mainly bleeding, bowel, and other organ injuries. No significant differences in the recurrence and pain rates at 1-year follow-up were observed.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic IPOM was found to have advantages over the open sublay technique regarding the rates of both surgical and general postoperative complications as well as complication-related reoperations, but disadvantages regarding the rate of intraoperative complications.

Keywords: Complications; Hernia registry; Incisional hernia; Laparoscopic IPOM; Sublay.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Simon T, Adolf D, Köckerling D, Mayer F, Reinpold W, Weyhe D, and Bittner R have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of patient inclusion
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flowchart of patient matching
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Standard differences between the matching variables both before (original sample) and after matching (matched sample)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Results of matched pairs analysis of laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh versus open sublay in incisional hernia repair

References

    1. Liang MK, Holihan JL, Itani K, et al. Ventral hernia management. Ann Surg. 2016
    1. Holihan JL, Nguyen DH, Nguyen MT, Mo J, Kao LS, Liang MK. Mesh location in open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2016;40(1):89–99. - PubMed
    1. Pham CT, Perera CL, Watkin DS, Maddern GL. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(1):4–15. - PubMed
    1. Forbes SS, Eskicioglu C, McLeod RS, Okrainec A. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh. Br J Surg. 2009;96(8):851–858. - PubMed
    1. Sajid MS, Bokhari SA, Mallick AS, Cheek E, Baig MK. Laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia: a meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2009;197(1):64–72. - PubMed

Publication types