Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;59(4):1897-1912.
doi: 10.1007/s10943-018-00755-w.

Can Religious and Spiritual Struggle Enhance Well-Being? Exploring the Mediating Effects of Internal Dialogues

Beata Zarzycka  1 , Małgorzata M Puchalska-Wasyl  2
Affiliations

Can Religious and Spiritual Struggle Enhance Well-Being? Exploring the Mediating Effects of Internal Dialogues

Beata Zarzycka et al. J Relig Health. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Although a number of studies have demonstrated links between religious/spiritual struggle and well-being, only a few have examined what makes religious/spiritual struggle increase or decrease well-being. The present paper aims to examine different forms of internal dialogues (IDs) as potential mediators of the relationship between religious/spiritual struggle and well-being among Roman Catholics. There were 143 respondents (81 female) who participated in the study. We applied the Religious and Spiritual Struggle Scale, the Internal Dialogical Activity Scale, and the Psychological Well-Being Scale. The results showed that religious/spiritual struggle triggers IDs. Three types of IDs-ruminative, supportive, and social simulation dialogues-were mediators in the relationship between religious/spiritual struggle and well-being. Although religious/spiritual struggle decreased well-being through its effect on ruminative dialogues, it improved well-being through its effects on supportive and social simulation dialogues.

Keywords: Internal dialogues; Religious/spiritual struggle; Well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagram of the general mediation model. Note c’—direct effect of predictor on outcome while controlling for the mediator; a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7—effect of the predictor on the mediator; b1, b2, b3, b4, b5, b6, b7—effect of the mediator on the outcome
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abu-Raiya H, Pargament KI, Exline JJ. Understanding and addressing religious and spiritual struggles in health care. Health and Social Work. 2015;40(4):e126–e134. doi: 10.1093/hsw/hlv055. - DOI
    1. Allport GW. The individual and his religion. New York: Macmillan; 1950.
    1. Ano GG, Vasconcelles EB. Religious coping and psychological adjustment to stress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2005;61(4):461–480. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20049. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borawski D. Wpływ aktywizowania myślenia dialogowego na sytuacyjną samoocenę i emocje [The influence of dialogical thinking on situational self-esteem and emotions] In: Oleś P, Puchalska-Wasyl M, Brygoła E, editors. Dialog z samym sobą [Dialogue with oneself] Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN; 2011. pp. 201–223.
    1. Cieciuch, J. (2011). Treść i sposób kształtowania tożsamości jako wyznaczniki dobrostanu osobowościowego [The content and way of shaping identity as determinants of personal well-being]. Presented at the XX Ogólnopolska Konferencja Psychologii Rozwojowej [XX National Conference on Developmental Psychology], Kraków.