Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb;10(2):296-303.
doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12950. Epub 2019 Jan 3.

Predicting delays in lung cancer diagnosis and staging

Affiliations

Predicting delays in lung cancer diagnosis and staging

Virginia Leiro-Fernández et al. Thorac Cancer. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Despite growing interest in increasing the efficiency and speed of the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of lung cancer (LC), the interval from signs and symptoms to diagnosis and treatment remains longer than recommended. The aim of this study was to analyze the factors that cause delays in the LC diagnosis/staging process and, consequently, delays in making therapeutic decisions.

Methods: We analyzed audit data from a prospective dataset of 1330 patients assessed at The Lung Cancer Rapid Diagnostic Unit from 26 June 2013 to 26 March 2016. The number and type of procedures and medical tests and the times of all procedures were recorded. Clinical and epidemiological variables and whether the diagnosis was performed on an inpatient or outpatient basis were also recorded.

Results: Malignancy was confirmed in 737 (55.4%) of the 1330 patients, with LC in 627 of these (85.2%). The mean interval to final diagnosis was 19.8 ± 13.9 days. Variables significantly related to a longer diagnostic time were the number of days until computed tomography (CT) was performed (odds ratio [OR], 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.347, 1.103-1.645; P = 0.003), until a histology sample was obtained (OR 1.243, 95% CI1.062-1.454; P = 0.007), and the total number of tests performed during the diagnostic and staging process (OR 1.823, 95% CI 1.046-3.177; P = 0.03).

Conclusions: A greater number of tests and more days to CT and histology led to longer delay times. Optimization of these factors should reduce delays in the LC diagnosis process.

Keywords: Alert radiology system; delay; diagnosis; lung cancer; rapid lung cancer diagnostic unit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Route of a patient who entered the Lung Cancer Rapid Diagnostic Unit (LCRDU).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagram of study participants.

References

    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R et al Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015; 136: E359–86. - PubMed
    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69–90. - PubMed
    1. National Cancer Institute, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program . Cancer Stat Facts: Cancer of the Lung and Bronchus [Cited 21 Feb 2018.] Available from URL: http://seer.cancer.gov/staffacts/html/lungb.html;2013
    1. Molina AJ, García‐Martínez L, Zapata‐Alvarado J, Alonso‐Orcajo N, Fernández‐Villa T, Martín V. Trends in lung cancer incidence in a healthcare area. Arch Bronconeumol 2015; 51: e53–5. - PubMed
    1. Santos‐Martínez MJ, Curull V, Blanco ML et al Lung cancer at a university hospital: Epidemiological and histological characteristics of a recent and a historical series. Arch Bronconeumol 2005; 41: 307–12. - PubMed