Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
- PMID: 30606051
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004979
Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Abstract
Background: Low socioeconomic status (SES) has been previously shown to be associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes. However, unlike in Australia, many of these studies have been performed in countries without universal healthcare where SES may be expected to have a greater impact on care and outcomes. We sought to determine whether there is an association between SES and baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes and use of secondary prevention therapy in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods and results: We prospectively collected data on 5665 consecutive ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction PCI patients between 2005 and 2015 from 6 government-funded hospitals participating in a multicenter registry. Patients were categorized into SES quintiles using the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage system, a score allocated to each residential postcode based on factors like income, educational level, and employment status by the Australian Bureau of Statistics. In our study, lower SES patients were more likely to have diabetes mellitus, smoke, and initially present to a non-PCI capable hospital (all P≤0.01). Among primary PCI patients, the median time to reperfusion was slightly higher in lower SES groups (211 [144-337] versus 193 [145-285] minutes, P<0.001). Drug-eluting stent use was higher in the higher SES groups ( P<0.001). At 12 months after PCI, lower SES patients had higher rates of ongoing smoking and lower use of guideline-recommended secondary prevention therapy (both P<0.01). Despite these differences, SES group was not found to be an independent predictor of 12-month major adverse cardiovascular events.
Conclusions: Lower SES patients have more comorbidities and experienced slightly longer reperfusion times but otherwise similar care. Despite these baseline differences, clinical outcomes after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction PCI were similar regardless of SES.
Keywords: epidemiology; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention; secondary prevention.
Similar articles
-
Association of Anemia With Outcomes Among ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Receiving Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec;11(12):e007175. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007175. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 30562086
-
Secondary prevention strategies after an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the AMI code era: beyond myocardial mechanical reperfusion.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Feb 7;17(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0493-6. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017. PMID: 28173757 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Regionalization of ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Care on Treatment Times and Outcomes for Emergency Medical Services-Transported Patients Presenting to Hospitals With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Mission: Lifeline Accelerator-2.Circulation. 2018 Jan 23;137(4):376-387. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032446. Epub 2017 Nov 14. Circulation. 2018. PMID: 29138292
-
Culprit Vessel-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov;10(11):e005582. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005582. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 29146672 Review.
-
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing percutaneous coronary intervention with aspiration thrombectomy Vs. Conventional percutaneous coronary intervention during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;87(7):1203-10. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26352. Epub 2015 Dec 23. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 26699698 Review.
Cited by
-
Socioeconomic Factors and their Impact on Access and Use of Coronary and Structural Interventions.Eur Cardiol. 2022 Oct 27;17:e19. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2022.23. eCollection 2022 Feb. Eur Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 36643068 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Socioeconomic Status and Prognosis of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Managed by the Emergency-Intervention "Codi IAM" Network.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 25;9:847982. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.847982. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 35548422 Free PMC article.
-
Pre-Hospital Delay and Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.Korean Circ J. 2024 Nov;54(11):693-706. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0085. Epub 2024 Jun 17. Korean Circ J. 2024. PMID: 39175338 Free PMC article.
-
Causal relationship between educational attainment and the occurrence of venous thromboembolism.BMC Med Genomics. 2025 Feb 7;18(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12920-025-02092-w. BMC Med Genomics. 2025. PMID: 39920705 Free PMC article.
-
Advancing Health Equity in the Cardiovascular Device Life Cycle.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025 Mar;18(3):e011310. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011310. Epub 2025 Feb 3. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025. PMID: 39895492 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous