Quasi-static and dynamic in vitro mechanical response of 3D printed scaffolds with tailored pore size and architectures
- PMID: 30606523
- DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.11.019
Quasi-static and dynamic in vitro mechanical response of 3D printed scaffolds with tailored pore size and architectures
Abstract
Scaffold-based Tissue Engineering represents the most promising approach for the regeneration of load bearing skeletal tissues, in particular bone and cartilage. Scaffolds play major role in this process by providing a physical template for cells to adhere and proliferate whilst ensuring an adequate biomechanical support at the defect site. Whereas the quasi static mechanical properties of porous polymeric scaffolds are well documented, the response of these constructs under high strain compressive rates remain poorly understood. Therefore, this study investigates, for the first time, the influence of pore size and geometry on the mechanical behaviour of Polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds under quasi static and dynamic conditions. 3D printed scaffolds with varied pore sizes and geometries were obtained using different filament distances (FD) and lay-down patterns, respectively. In particular, by fixing the lay-down pattern at 0/90° and varying the FD between 480 and 980 μm it was possible to generate scaffolds with square pores with dimensions in the range of 150-650 μm and porosities of 59-79%. On the other hand, quadrangular, hexagonal, triangular and complex pore geometries with constant porosity (approx. 70%) were obtained at a fixed FD of 680 μm and imposing four different lay-down patterns of 0/90, 0/60/120, 0/45/90/135 and 0/30/60/90/120/150°, respectively. The mechanical response of printed scaffolds was assessed under two different compression loading regimes spanning five distinct strain rates, from 10-2 to 2000 s-1, using two different apparatus: a conventional screw-driven testing machine (Instron 4483) and a Split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) equipped with a set of A201 Flexi-force™ (FF) force sensors and a pulse shaper. Our results show that the mechanical properties of PCL scaffolds are not strain rate sensitive between 1300 and 2000 s-1 and these strongly depend on the pore size (porosity) rather than pore geometry. Those findings are extremely relevant for the engineering of bone tissue scaffolds with enhanced mechanical stability by providing new data describing the mechanical response of these constructs at high strain rates as well as the at the transition between quasi static and dynamic regimes.
Keywords: 3D bioprinting; Dynamic; High strain rate; Mechanical response; Quasi static; Scaffolds.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The first systematic analysis of 3D rapid prototyped poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds manufactured through BioCell printing: the effect of pore size and geometry on compressive mechanical behaviour and in vitro hMSC viability.Biofabrication. 2013 Dec;5(4):045004. doi: 10.1088/1758-5082/5/4/045004. Epub 2013 Nov 6. Biofabrication. 2013. PMID: 24192056
-
Modulating mechanical behaviour of 3D-printed cartilage-mimetic PCL scaffolds: influence of molecular weight and pore geometry.Biofabrication. 2016 Jun 22;8(2):025020. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/2/025020. Biofabrication. 2016. PMID: 27328736
-
Structural monitoring and modeling of the mechanical deformation of three-dimensional printed poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds.Biofabrication. 2017 May 11;9(2):025015. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa698e. Biofabrication. 2017. PMID: 28349900
-
Integrating finite element modelling and 3D printing to engineer biomimetic polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering.Connect Tissue Res. 2020 Mar;61(2):174-189. doi: 10.1080/03008207.2019.1656720. Epub 2019 Sep 8. Connect Tissue Res. 2020. PMID: 31495233 Review.
-
Three-Dimensional Printed Polycaprolactone Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration Success and Future Perspective.Tissue Eng Part A. 2019 Jul;25(13-14):931-935. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2019.0102. Tissue Eng Part A. 2019. PMID: 31084409 Review.
Cited by
-
Investigation into relationships between design parameters and mechanical properties of 3D printed PCL/nHAp bone scaffolds.PLoS One. 2023 Jul 14;18(7):e0288531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288531. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37450462 Free PMC article.
-
3D-Printed PCL/Zn scaffolds for bone regeneration with a dose-dependent effect on osteogenesis and osteoclastogenesis.Mater Today Bio. 2022 Jan 1;13:100202. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100202. eCollection 2022 Jan. Mater Today Bio. 2022. PMID: 35036897 Free PMC article.
-
3D Bioprinted Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: State-Of-The-Art and Emerging Technologies.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Apr 11;10:824156. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.824156. eCollection 2022. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 35480972 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Vibrometry as a noncontact alternative to dynamic and viscoelastic mechanical testing in cartilage.J R Soc Interface. 2021 Dec;18(185):20210765. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0765. Epub 2021 Dec 22. J R Soc Interface. 2021. PMID: 34932927 Free PMC article.
-
Bioprinting-Enabled Biomaterials: A Cutting-Edge Strategy for Future Osteoarthritis Therapy.Int J Nanomedicine. 2023 Nov 1;18:6213-6232. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S432468. eCollection 2023. Int J Nanomedicine. 2023. PMID: 37933298 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources