Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;95(4):300-306.
doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2018-053778. Epub 2019 Jan 3.

Relation between Chlamydia trachomatis infection and pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy and tubal factor infertility in a Dutch cohort of women previously tested for chlamydia in a chlamydia screening trial

Affiliations

Relation between Chlamydia trachomatis infection and pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy and tubal factor infertility in a Dutch cohort of women previously tested for chlamydia in a chlamydia screening trial

Bernice M Hoenderboom et al. Sex Transm Infect. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: A better understanding of Chlamydia trachomatis infection (chlamydia)-related sequelae can provide a framework for effective chlamydia control strategies. The objective of this study was to estimate risks and risk factors of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), ectopic pregnancy and tubal factor infertility (TFI) with a follow-up time of up until 8 years in women previously tested for chlamydia in the Chlamydia Screening Implementation study (CSI) and participating in the Netherlands Chlamydia Cohort Study (NECCST).

Methods: Women who participated in the CSI 2008-2011 (n=13 498) were invited in 2015-2016 for NECCST. Chlamydia positive was defined as a positive CSI-PCR test, positive chlamydia serology and/or self-reported infection (time dependent). Data on PID, ectopic pregnancy and TFI were collected by self-completed questionnaires. Incidence rates and HRs were compared between chlamydia-positive and chlamydia-negative women corrected for confounders.

Results: Of 5704 women included, 29.5% (95% CI 28.3 to 30.7) were chlamydia positive. The incidence rate of PID was 1.8 per 1000 person-years (py) (1.6 to 2.2) overall, 4.4 per 1000 py (3.3 to 5.7) among chlamydia positives compared with 1.4 per 1000 py (1.1 to 1.7) for chlamydia negatives. For TFI, this was 0.4 per 1000 py (0.3 to 0.5) overall, 1.3 per 1000 py (0.8 to 2.1) and 0.2 per 1000 py (0.1 to 0.4) among chlamydia positives and negatives, respectively. And for ectopic pregnancy, this was 0.6 per 1000 py (0.5 to 0.8) overall, 0.8 per 1000 py (0.4 to 1.5) and 0.6 per 1000 py (0.4 to 0.8) for chlamydia negatives. Among chlamydia-positive women, the strongest risk factor for PID was symptomatic versus asymptomatic infection (adjusted HR 2.88, 1.4 to 4.5) and for TFI age <20 versus >24 years at first infection (HR 4.35, 1.1 to 16.8).

Conclusion: We found a considerably higher risk for PID and TFI in chlamydia-positive women, but the incidence for ectopic pregnancy was comparable between chlamydia-positive and chlamydia-negative women. Overall, the incidence rates of sequelae remained low.

Trial registration: NTR-5597.

Keywords: chlamydia trachomatis; cohort study; ectopic pregnancy; pelvic inflammatory disease; serology; tubal factor infertility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier plots of time (years) by chlamydia status since sexual debut. (A) Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). (B) Ectopic pregnancy. (C) Tubal factor infertility (TFI). Chlamydia positive was defined as a positive PCR-test outcome in the CSI study (CSI-PCR), and/or the presence of chlamydia IgG and/or a self-reported chlamydia infection. CSI, Chlamydia Screening Implementation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of various sensitivity analyses of the risk for pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), ectopic pregnancy and tubal factor infertility (TFI) between chlamydia-positive and chlamydia-negative women in HRs and 95% CI. CSI, Chlamydia Screening Implementation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Newman L, Rowley J, Vander Hoorn S, et al. . Global estimates of the prevalence and incidence of four curable sexually transmitted infections in 2012 based on systematic review and global reporting. PLoS One 2015;10:e0143304 10.1371/journal.pone.0143304 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woodhall SC, Wills GS, Horner PJ, et al. . Chlamydia trachomatis Pgp3 antibody population seroprevalence before and during an era of widespread opportunistic chlamydia screening in England (1994–2012). Plos One 2017;12:e0152810 10.1371/journal.pone.0152810 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Aar F, de Moraes M, Morré SA, et al. . Chlamydia trachomatis IgG seroprevalence in the general population of the Netherlands in 1996 and in 2007: differential changes by gender and age. Sex Transm Infect 2014;90:434–40. 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051074 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Low N, McCarthy A, Macleod J, et al. . Epidemiological, social, diagnostic and economic evaluation of population screening for genital chlamydial infection. Health Technol Assess 2007;11:1–165. 10.3310/hta11080 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haggerty CL, Gottlieb SL, Taylor BD, et al. . Risk of sequelae after Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection in women. J Infect Dis 2010;201(S2):134–55. 10.1086/652395 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data