Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;25(6):e533-e538.
doi: 10.3747/co.25.4090. Epub 2018 Dec 1.

Impact of high-fidelity e-learning on knowledge acquisition and satisfaction in radiation oncology trainees

C Gillan  1   2 , J Papadakos  3 , J Brual  2 , N Harnett  1   2 , A Hogan  1 , E Milne  1 , M E Giuliani  1   2
Affiliations

Impact of high-fidelity e-learning on knowledge acquisition and satisfaction in radiation oncology trainees

C Gillan et al. Curr Oncol. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Background: e-Learning is an underutilized tool in education for the health professions, and radiation medicine, given its reliance on technology for clinical practice, is well-suited to training simulation in online environments. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the knowledge impact and user interface satisfaction of high-(hf) compared with low-fidelity (lf) e-learning modules (e-modules) in radiation oncology training.

Methods: Two versions of an e-module on lung radiotherapy (lf and hf) were developed. Radiation oncology residents and fellows were invited to be randomized to complete either the lf or the hf module through individual online accounts over a 2-week period. A 25-item multiple-choice knowledge assessment was administered before and after module completion, and user interface satisfaction was measured using the Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction (quis) tool.

Results: Of 18 trainees, 8 were randomized to the lf module, and 10, to the hf module. Overall, knowledge assessment performance increased (11%, p < 0.05), with hf-group participants reporting a 13% improvement (p = 0.02), and senior participants reporting an almost 15% improvement (p < 0.01). Scores on the quis indicated that participants were satisfied with various aspects of the user interface.

Conclusions: The hf e-module had a greater impact on knowledge acquisition, and users expressed satisfaction with the interface in both the hf and lf situations. The use of e-learning in a competency-based curriculum could have educational advantages; participants expressed benefits and drawbacks. Preferences for e-learning integration in education for the health professions should be explored further.

Keywords: Radiation medicine; e-learning; radiation oncology training; user interaction satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES We have read and understood Current Oncology’s policy on disclosing conflicts of interest, and we declare that we have none.

References

    1. Pucer P, Vavpotic D, Žvanut B. Improving the use of e-learning in health care curricula: presentation of best practices. J e-Learn High Educ Manag. 2016;2016:14–25.
    1. Sheen ST, Chang WY, Chen HL, Chao HL, Tseng CP. e-Learning education program for registered nurses: the experience of a teaching medical center. J Nurs Res. 2008;16:195–201. doi: 10.1097/01.JNR.0000387306.34741.70. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2006;81:207–12. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petty J. Interactive, technology-enhanced self-regulated learning tools in healthcare education: a literature review. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33:53–9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.06.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300:1181–96. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.10.1181. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types