Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 1;10(11):e1115-e1122.
doi: 10.4317/jced.55148. eCollection 2018 Nov.

Effect of rinsing time and surface contamination on the bond strength of silorane-based and dimethacrylate-based composites to enamel

Affiliations

Effect of rinsing time and surface contamination on the bond strength of silorane-based and dimethacrylate-based composites to enamel

Farnoosh Fallahzadeh et al. J Clin Exp Dent. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to assess whether saliva contamination and rinsing time for 15, 30, and 60 seconds, affects the shear bond strength of silorane and methacrylate-based composites to enamel.

Material and methods: Two light cure resin, P60 (3M ESPE) and Filtek LS Silorane were tested. 120 sound premolars were randomly divided into four groups of 30 teeth based on composite type with or without saliva contamination after etching and rinsing. Each group was further divided into three subgroups according to their rinsing time. Then a cylinder of the composite was bonded to the enamel and Shear bond strength was assessed. To determine the failure mode, the bonded surfaces were then observed under SEM. In addition, the DC of each group was measured at pH levels of 4 and 7 using FTIR spectroscopy. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and post hoc analysis followed by Fisher's least significant difference.

Results: The bond strength of the non-contaminated methacrylate group was significantly higher than the other groups (p< 0.0001). In addition, there was no significant deference between the methacrylate subgroups. In the silorane groups, the shear bond strength was higher in the rinsing time of 15 seconds. Failure pattern was mainly adhesive. The DC of the Methacrylates had no significant difference at pH 4 and pH 7, but was significantly higher than that of siloranes (p< 0.0001). While the DC of the siloranes at pH 4 was significantly higher than at pH 7 (p< 0.0001).

Conclusions: Saliva contamination in both composites reduces bond strength. Increasing rinsing time in Methacrylates proves ineffective. In non-contaminated siloranes, excessive rinsing time reduced bond strength. The best-recommended rinsing time for both composite is 15 seconds. Key words:Composite resins, silorane composite resin, methacrylates, shear strength.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Classifying samples based on adhesive system, contamination type, and rinsing time (15 s, 30 s, 60 s) (RT: rinsing time).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sample preparation steps.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yamazaki PC, Bedran-Russo AK, Pereira PN, Wsift EJ Jr. Microleakage evaluation of a new low-shrinkage composite restorative material. Operative dentistry. 2006;31:670–6. - PubMed
    1. Bagis YH, Baltacioglu IH, Kahyaogullari S. Comparing microleakage and the layering methods of silorane-based resin composite in wide Class II MOD cavities. Operative dentistry. 2009;34:578–85. - PubMed
    1. Van Ende A, De Munck J, Mine A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Does a low-shrinking composite induce less stress at the adhesive interface? Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2010;26:215–22. - PubMed
    1. Odian G. Principles of polymerization. 4th ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, publication; 2004. pp. 445–8.
    1. Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberger R. Siloranes in dental composites. Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2005;21:68–74. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources