Effect of rinsing time and surface contamination on the bond strength of silorane-based and dimethacrylate-based composites to enamel
- PMID: 30607230
- PMCID: PMC6311400
- DOI: 10.4317/jced.55148
Effect of rinsing time and surface contamination on the bond strength of silorane-based and dimethacrylate-based composites to enamel
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to assess whether saliva contamination and rinsing time for 15, 30, and 60 seconds, affects the shear bond strength of silorane and methacrylate-based composites to enamel.
Material and methods: Two light cure resin, P60 (3M ESPE) and Filtek LS Silorane were tested. 120 sound premolars were randomly divided into four groups of 30 teeth based on composite type with or without saliva contamination after etching and rinsing. Each group was further divided into three subgroups according to their rinsing time. Then a cylinder of the composite was bonded to the enamel and Shear bond strength was assessed. To determine the failure mode, the bonded surfaces were then observed under SEM. In addition, the DC of each group was measured at pH levels of 4 and 7 using FTIR spectroscopy. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and post hoc analysis followed by Fisher's least significant difference.
Results: The bond strength of the non-contaminated methacrylate group was significantly higher than the other groups (p< 0.0001). In addition, there was no significant deference between the methacrylate subgroups. In the silorane groups, the shear bond strength was higher in the rinsing time of 15 seconds. Failure pattern was mainly adhesive. The DC of the Methacrylates had no significant difference at pH 4 and pH 7, but was significantly higher than that of siloranes (p< 0.0001). While the DC of the siloranes at pH 4 was significantly higher than at pH 7 (p< 0.0001).
Conclusions: Saliva contamination in both composites reduces bond strength. Increasing rinsing time in Methacrylates proves ineffective. In non-contaminated siloranes, excessive rinsing time reduced bond strength. The best-recommended rinsing time for both composite is 15 seconds. Key words:Composite resins, silorane composite resin, methacrylates, shear strength.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Evaluating the shear bond strength of enamel and dentin with or without etching: A comparative study between dimethacrylate-based and silorane-based adhesives.J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Dec 1;7(5):e563-8. doi: 10.4317/jced.52322. eCollection 2015 Dec. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015. PMID: 26644830 Free PMC article.
-
Reparability of aged silorane with methacrylate-based resin composite: micro-shear bond strength and scanning electron microscopy evaluation.Oper Dent. 2012 Jan-Feb;37(1):28-36. doi: 10.2341/10-397-L. Epub 2011 Sep 26. Oper Dent. 2012. PMID: 21942241
-
Repair bond strength in aged methacrylate- and silorane-based composites.J Adhes Dent. 2013 Oct;15(5):447-52. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a29590. J Adhes Dent. 2013. PMID: 23593643 Clinical Trial.
-
Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010 Winter;35(2):173-81. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.35.2.u6142007hj421041. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010. PMID: 21417120
-
Influence of saliva contamination on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching adhesive systems.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jul;138(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.035. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010. PMID: 20620837
Cited by
-
Comparative evaluation of different methods of saliva decontamination on microshear bond strength of composite to composite: An in vitro study.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2025 Jun 27;22:27. doi: 10.4103/drj.drj_736_23. eCollection 2025. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2025. PMID: 40655899 Free PMC article.
-
The Classification and Selection of Adhesive Agents; an Overview for the General Dentist.Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2023 Sep 4;15:165-180. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S425024. eCollection 2023. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2023. PMID: 37692095 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Yamazaki PC, Bedran-Russo AK, Pereira PN, Wsift EJ Jr. Microleakage evaluation of a new low-shrinkage composite restorative material. Operative dentistry. 2006;31:670–6. - PubMed
-
- Bagis YH, Baltacioglu IH, Kahyaogullari S. Comparing microleakage and the layering methods of silorane-based resin composite in wide Class II MOD cavities. Operative dentistry. 2009;34:578–85. - PubMed
-
- Van Ende A, De Munck J, Mine A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Does a low-shrinking composite induce less stress at the adhesive interface? Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2010;26:215–22. - PubMed
-
- Odian G. Principles of polymerization. 4th ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, publication; 2004. pp. 445–8.
-
- Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberger R. Siloranes in dental composites. Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2005;21:68–74. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources