Comparing the precision of panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in avoiding anatomical structures critical to dental implant surgery: A retrospective study
- PMID: 30607351
- PMCID: PMC6305775
- DOI: 10.5624/isd.2018.48.4.269
Comparing the precision of panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in avoiding anatomical structures critical to dental implant surgery: A retrospective study
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlations between measurements made using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) based on certain anatomical landmarks of the jaws, with the goal of preventing complications due to inaccurate measurements in the pre-surgical planning phase of dental implant placement.
Materials and methods: A total of 56 individuals who underwent panoramic radiography and a CBCT evaluation before dental implant surgery were enrolled in the study. Measurements were performed to identify the shortest vertical distance between the alveolar crest and neighboring anatomical structures, including the maxillary sinus, nasal floor, mandibular canal, and foramen mentale. The differences between the measurements on panoramic radiography and CBCT images were statistically analyzed.
Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between the measurements on panoramic radiography and CBCT for all anatomical structures (P<.05). The correlation coefficients (r) between the paired samples obtained from panoramic radiography and CBCT were closely correlated (P<.05), with r values varying from 0.921 and 0.979 for different anatomical regions.
Conclusion: The results of this study support the idea that panoramic radiography might provide sufficient information on bone height for preoperative implant planning in routine cases or when CBCT is unavailable. However, an additional CBCT evaluation might be helpful in cases where a safety margin cannot be respected due to insufficient bone height.
Keywords: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Dental Implants; Radiography, Panoramic.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of the Panoramic and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Imaging Methods in the Surgical Planning of the Maxillary All-On-4, M-4, and V-4.Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jul 27;2022:1553340. doi: 10.1155/2022/1553340. eCollection 2022. Biomed Res Int. 2022. PMID: 35937385 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Dental Panoramic Radiography and CBCT for Measuring Vertical Bone Height in Different Horizontal Locations of Posterior Mandibular Alveolar Process.J Dent (Shiraz). 2018 Jun;19(2):83-91. J Dent (Shiraz). 2018. PMID: 29854881 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of digital panoramic radiography versus cone beam computerized tomography for measuring alveolar bone.Head Face Med. 2017 Feb 22;13(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13005-017-0135-3. Head Face Med. 2017. PMID: 28228135 Free PMC article.
-
An Overview of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Dental Panoramic Radiography in Dentistry in the Community.Tomography. 2024 Aug 7;10(8):1222-1237. doi: 10.3390/tomography10080092. Tomography. 2024. PMID: 39195727 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Importance of cone beam computed tomography in the recognition of the trajectory and anatomical variants of the mandibular canal. A review of the literature].Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2021 Mar 11;9(1):e046. doi: 10.21142/2523-2754-0901-2021-046. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar. Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2021. PMID: 38464412 Free PMC article. Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
A Review of Doses for Dental Imaging in 2010-2020 and Development of a Web Dose Calculator.Radiol Res Pract. 2021 Dec 10;2021:6924314. doi: 10.1155/2021/6924314. eCollection 2021. Radiol Res Pract. 2021. PMID: 35070450 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of the Panoramic and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Imaging Methods in the Surgical Planning of the Maxillary All-On-4, M-4, and V-4.Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jul 27;2022:1553340. doi: 10.1155/2022/1553340. eCollection 2022. Biomed Res Int. 2022. PMID: 35937385 Free PMC article.
-
[Use of diagnostic modalities for dentofacial imaging in forensic dentistry. Literature review].Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2021 Dec 9;9(4):e088. doi: 10.21142/2523-2754-0904-2021-088. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec. Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2021. PMID: 38463727 Free PMC article. Review. Spanish.
-
Evaluation of the Metal Artifact Caused by Dental Implants in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images.Maedica (Bucur). 2020 Jun;15(2):224-229. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2020.15.2.224. Maedica (Bucur). 2020. PMID: 32952687 Free PMC article.
-
Digital panoramic radiography and CBCT as auxiliary tools for detection of low bone mineral density in post-menopausal women: a cross-sectional study.BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Jun 12;23(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-01046-x. BMC Med Imaging. 2023. PMID: 37308822 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Misch K, Wang HL. Implant surgery complications: etiology and treatment. Implant Dent. 2008;17:159–168. - PubMed
-
- Ahlqwist M, Halling A, Hollender L. Rotational panoramic radiography in epidemiological studies of dental health. Comparison between panoramic radiographs and intraoral full mouth surveys. Swed Dent J. 1986;10:73–84. - PubMed
-
- Lecomber AR, Yoneyama Y, Lovelock DJ, Hosoi T, Adams AM. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001;30:255–259. - PubMed