Jealousy, Consent, and Compersion Within Monogamous and Consensually Non-Monogamous Romantic Relationships
- PMID: 30607710
- DOI: 10.1007/s10508-018-1286-4
Jealousy, Consent, and Compersion Within Monogamous and Consensually Non-Monogamous Romantic Relationships
Abstract
Evolutionary psychological research has studied romantic jealousy extensively within monogamous relationships, but has largely ignored jealousy among partners who mutually consent to forming extra-pair relationships (i.e., consensual non-monogamy; CNM). We examined monogamous (n = 529) and CNM (n = 159) individuals' reactions to imagining their romantic partner(s)'s extra-pair involvement. For each romantic partner, men and women completed measures of relationship jealousy and reacted to scenarios of their partner's extra-pair emotional and sexual involvement. Scenarios prompted participants to indicate which type of involvement would be more distressing and more enjoyable. They also described whether or not participants had consented to their partner's extradyadic relationship. Monogamous men were more distressed by a partner's extradyadic sexual versus emotional involvement (and a partner's emotional involvement was more enjoyable) whether the scenario was consensual or not. Monogamous women were more distressed by a partner's emotional versus sexual involvement (and a partner's sexual involvement was more enjoyable) for consensual, but not non-consensual, scenarios. There were no gender differences among CNM participants. Monogamous individuals reported greater emotional distress toward a partner's imagined extradyadic involvement, whereas CNM individuals reported thinking about their partner's extra-pair relationships more frequently. Monogamous (vs. CNM) individuals reported greater confidence that their partner would never cheat on them (i.e., enter another relationship without their consent), and CNM participants were more confident that their primary versus secondary partner would never cheat, although this effect was stronger among CNM women. Moreover, CNM participants rated that it was more important that their primary versus secondary partner did not cheat, and reported greater distress imagining that their primary versus secondary partner had cheated. Women in CNM relationships rated it more important that their partner did not cheat sexually than emotionally. Finally, we replicated previous research showing that monogamous individuals mate guard more than CNM individuals, who mate guard their primary versus secondary partner more frequently. Future directions for developing evolutionary and romantic relationship research on CNM are discussed.
Keywords: Compersion; Consensual non-monogamy; Gender differences; Jealousy; Polyamory.
Similar articles
-
Compersion: When Jealousy-Inducing Situations Don't (Just) Induce Jealousy.Arch Sex Behav. 2021 May;50(4):1311-1324. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01853-1. Epub 2021 May 26. Arch Sex Behav. 2021. PMID: 34041641
-
Monogamy versus Consensual Non-Monogamy: Alternative Approaches to Pursuing a Strategically Pluralistic Mating Strategy.Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Feb;46(2):407-417. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0658-2. Epub 2015 Dec 17. Arch Sex Behav. 2017. PMID: 26679305
-
Your Happiness Is My Happiness: Predicting Positive Feelings for a Partner's Consensual Extra-Dyadic Intimate Relations.Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Mar;53(3):941-958. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02766-5. Epub 2024 Jan 4. Arch Sex Behav. 2024. PMID: 38177605
-
[Sex differences in sexual versus emotional jealousy: evolutionary approach and recent discussions].Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2008 Fall;19(3):300-9. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2008. PMID: 18791883 Review. Turkish.
-
A Narrative Review of the Dichotomy Between the Social Views of Non-Monogamy and the Experiences of Consensual Non-Monogamous People.Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Mar;53(3):931-940. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02786-1. Epub 2024 Jan 4. Arch Sex Behav. 2024. PMID: 38177608 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Prevalence, Psychological Responses and Associated Correlates of Depression, Anxiety and Stress in a Global Population, During the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic.Community Ment Health J. 2021 Jan;57(1):101-110. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00728-y. Epub 2020 Oct 27. Community Ment Health J. 2021. PMID: 33108569 Free PMC article.
-
Feeling Good About Your Partners' Relationships: Compersion in Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships.Arch Sex Behav. 2021 May;50(4):1569-1585. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-01985-y. Epub 2021 Jun 1. Arch Sex Behav. 2021. PMID: 34075503
-
Factors that Facilitate and Hinder the Experience of Compersion Among Individuals in Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships.Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Aug;51(6):3035-3048. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02333-4. Epub 2022 Jul 25. Arch Sex Behav. 2022. PMID: 35876980
-
Compersion: When Jealousy-Inducing Situations Don't (Just) Induce Jealousy.Arch Sex Behav. 2021 May;50(4):1311-1324. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01853-1. Epub 2021 May 26. Arch Sex Behav. 2021. PMID: 34041641
-
Clarifying Anticipated Feelings of Jealousy: Development and Validation of the Anticipated Jealousy Scale.Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Apr;51(3):1471-1494. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02184-5. Epub 2022 Feb 7. Arch Sex Behav. 2022. PMID: 35132482
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources