List-strength effects in older adults in recognition and free recall
- PMID: 30607754
- DOI: 10.3758/s13421-018-0886-5
List-strength effects in older adults in recognition and free recall
Abstract
The present investigation provides a novel extension of the retrieving effectively from memory (REM) model to examine free-recall and recognition memory in older adults to inform our understanding of age-related cognitive decline. When some items on a list are strengthened through distributed repetitions, memory for the nonstrengthened items on that list may become impaired depending on how memory is tested-a phenomenon known as the list-strength effect (LSE; e.g., Tulving & Hastie, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 297-304, 1972). When the strengthening operation involves distributed repetitions, LSE is robust in free recall, but it is reliably absent in recognition (Malmberg & Shiffrin, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 322-336, 2005; Ratcliff, Clark, & Shiffrin, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 163-178, 1990). Two experiments investigated LSE in recall and recognition in older adults and young adults who encoded items with full or divided attention. Despite showing impaired recall and recognition, older adults showed patterns of LSEs across both experiments that were similar to young adults with full attention rather than young adults with divided attention. In recognition, there was a null LSE in older and young adults, but a positive LSE was observed under divided attention. In contrast, in free recall, there was a positive LSE in older and young adults, but a null LSE under divided attention. Collectively, the results suggest that older adults do not have impaired encoding of context information (evidenced by intact LSE in recall), and they do not have impaired differentiation of item representations (evidenced by the null LSE in recognition). Age-related impairment in both memory tasks can be accounted for by sparse encoding of item-based information.
Keywords: Aging; Divided attention; Free recall; List-strength effect; Recognition; Strength-based mirror effect.
Similar articles
-
Testing a Strategy-Disruption Account of the List-Strength Effect.Exp Psychol. 2020 Jul;67(4):255-275. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000494. Exp Psychol. 2020. PMID: 33111659
-
Individual differences in contextual storage: evidence from the list-strength effect.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 May;40(3):873-81. doi: 10.1037/a0035222. Epub 2013 Dec 2. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014. PMID: 24294917
-
Modeling list-strength and spacing effects using version 3 of the retrieving effectively from memory (REM.3) model and its superimposition-of-similar-images assumption.Behav Res Methods. 2021 Feb;53(1):4-21. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01324-z. Behav Res Methods. 2021. PMID: 31898291
-
Age-related differences in recall and recognition: a meta-analysis.Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Oct;26(5):1529-1547. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01649-y. Psychon Bull Rev. 2019. PMID: 31396816 Review.
-
Age differences in the neural correlates of novelty processing: The effects of item-relatedness.Brain Res. 2015 Jul 1;1612:2-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 19. Brain Res. 2015. PMID: 25149192 Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical