Risk factors of efficacy for patients receiving surgical treatment following terrible triad of the elbow joint: A comparative study
- PMID: 30608399
- PMCID: PMC6344182
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013836
Risk factors of efficacy for patients receiving surgical treatment following terrible triad of the elbow joint: A comparative study
Abstract
Background: This study aims to explore the efficacy of surgical and conservative treatment for elbow joint terrible triad, and evaluate related factors affecting surgical treatment efficacy.
Methods: Patients with terrible triad of elbow joint (n = 165) were selected, among which 79 cases underwent conservative treatment (the control group) and 86 cases underwent surgical treatment (the experimental group). The range of flexion and extension, range of rotation and Mayo elbow performance score were recorded. In the experimental group, postoperation, according to the Mayo elbow performance score, patients were assigned into the effective group (72 cases) and ineffective group (14 cases). All patients were followed up regularly for 6 to 24 months. X-ray and computed tomography examination were used to examine anterior and posterior elbow joints preoperatively and postoperatively and the degree of arm rotation.
Results: The range of flexion and extension, range of rotation and Mayo elbow performance score were found to be significantly higher in the experimental group after treatment compared to the experimental group before treatment and in the control group after treatment. Seven days after treatment, compared with the control group, the expressions of interleukin (IL)-6, C-reactive protein, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-α in serum decreased, and returned to almost near normal levels in the experimental group. Age, mean operative time, and postoperative immobilization time were significantly different between the effective and ineffective groups. The incidence of joint stiffness, heterotopic ossification, and ulnar nerve symptoms in the effective group were lower than those in the ineffective group. The postoperative immobilization time served a protective factor for the efficacy of surgical treatment of elbow joint terrible triad, while age served as a risk factor.
Conclusion: The results indicated that surgical treatment regimens for elbow joint terrible triad exhibited better efficacy than conservative treatment regimens, and lower age and longer postoperative immobilization time serve as protective factors for surgical treatment efficacy.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Arthrolysis combined with reconstruction for treatment of terrible triad injury with a poor outcome after surgical as well as conservative intervention.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Mar;134(3):325-31. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-1923-x. Epub 2014 Jan 29. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014. PMID: 24474612
-
Evaluation of the therapeutic effects of lateral approach combined with anteromedial approach in the treatment of terrible triad of the elbow.Biomed Pharmacother. 2017 Jul;91:748-754. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 May 9. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017. PMID: 28499246
-
Terrible triad injuries of the elbow: does the coronoid always need to be fixed?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2084-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3471-7. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014. PMID: 24474322 Free PMC article.
-
[Operative treatment of terrible triad injury of the elbow : Open reduction and internal fixation].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Apr;29(2):125-137. doi: 10.1007/s00064-017-0489-5. Epub 2017 Mar 17. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2017. PMID: 28314869 Review. German.
-
Replacement or repair of terrible triad of the elbow: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(6):e13054. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013054. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 30732120 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Radial head arthroplasty vs. open reduction and internal fixation for the treatment of terrible triad injury of the elbow: A systematic review and meta-analysis update.Exp Ther Med. 2022 Jul 27;24(3):592. doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11529. eCollection 2022 Sep. Exp Ther Med. 2022. PMID: 35949335 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics of rehabilitation protocols following operative treatment of terrible triad elbow injuries and the influence of early motion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Aug 6:17585732241269807. doi: 10.1177/17585732241269807. Online ahead of print. Shoulder Elbow. 2024. PMID: 39552691 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Surgical outcomes and complication rates of arthroscopic-assisted fixation versus open fixation for coronoid fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Shoulder Elbow. 2025 Jan;17(1):86-95. doi: 10.1177/17585732241229636. Epub 2024 Feb 16. Shoulder Elbow. 2025. PMID: 39552669 Free PMC article.
-
The supinator approach to the lateral elbow: a technique description and literature review.JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024 Jun 26;4(4):750-756. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.06.004. eCollection 2024 Nov. JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024. PMID: 39474193 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Skelley NW, Chamberlain A. A novel reduction technique for elbow dislocations. Orthopedics 2015;38:42–4. - PubMed
-
- Fitzpatrick MJ, Diltz M, McGarry MH, et al. A new fracture model for “terrible triad” injuries of the elbow: influence of forearm rotation on injury patterns. J Orthop Trauma 2012;26:591–6. - PubMed
-
- Yan M, Ni J, Song D, et al. Radial head replacement or repair for the terrible triad of the elbow: which procedure is better? ANZ J Surg 2015;85:644–8. - PubMed
-
- Desai MM, Sonone SV, Badve SA. Terrible triad of the elbow: a case report of a new variant. J Postgrad Med 2006;52:43–4. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials