Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Jan;98(1):e13842.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013842.

Prognostic role of high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prognostic role of high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Meta-analysis

Ling Bo Xue et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Background: We aimed to evaluate the correlation of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with pathological response, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with breast cancer and under neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

Materials and methods: We performed a systematical search using Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to May 2018. On the basis of the data directly obtained from the available studies, the odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were pooled on the basis of higher or lower NLR levels.

Results: The meta-analysis showed that high NLR was significantly associated with poor NAC response (OR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.46-3.53, P < .001) but not with the DFS (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.78-1.78, P = .435) and OS (OR = 2.781, 95% CI: 0.54-14.32, P = .221).

Conclusion: Although high NLR was significantly associated with poor pathological response, we were unable to demonstrate the prognostic value of NLR for DFS and OS in patients with breast cancer who were undergoing NAC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the inclusion and exclusion of studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of the association of high NLR and prognostic role. (A) Pathological response, (B) DFS, and (C) OS.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Funnel plots of pathological response for publication bias.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sensitivity analysis of the relationships between high NLR and the pathological response.

References

    1. Mersin H, Yildirim E, Berberoglu U, et al. The prognostic importance of triple negative breast carcinoma. Breast 2008;17:341–6. - PubMed
    1. Chaudry M, Lei X, Gonzalezangulo AM, et al. Recurrence and survival among breast cancer patients achieving a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015;153:417–23. - PubMed
    1. Montagna E, Bagnardi V, Rotmensz N, et al. Pathological complete response after preoperative systemic therapy and outcome: relevance of clinical and biologic baseline features. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;124:689–99. - PubMed
    1. Cheng X, Li Y, Liu B, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET for evaluation of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Acta Radiol 2012;53:615–27. - PubMed
    1. Asano Y, Kashiwagi S, Onoda N, et al. Predictive value of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio for efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:1104–10. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances