Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Jan;98(1):e13917.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013917.

A randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency for patients with frozen shoulder

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency for patients with frozen shoulder

Juan Yan et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Background: This study assessed the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency (UGPRF) for patients with frozen shoulder (FS).

Methods: This study was designed as a randomized, double-blind, sham control trial. A total of 136 patients with FS were recruited and then were equally randomly allocated into a treatment group (n = 68) and a sham group (n = 68). The patients in the treatment group received UGPRF, while the subjects in the sham group underwent sham UGPRF. Patients in both groups were treated for a total of 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the pain intensity, measured by the visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes consisted of shoulder disorder, measured by the score of shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI); quality of life, assessed by the Short Form-36 questionnaire (SF-36); and any adverse events (AEs) during the treatment period. All outcomes were measured at baseline, at the end of 6-week, and 12-week treatment.

Results: At the end of 6 weeks, and 12 weeks, UGPRF showed more promising outcome results in pain relief, as measured by VAS (P <.01), improvement of shoulder disorder, as assessed by SPADI score (pain, P <.01; disability, P <.01; total, P <.01), and enhancement of quality of life, as measured by the SF-36 scale (PCS, P <.01; MCS, P <.01), compared with sham UGPRF in this study.

Conclusion: The findings of this study showed that UGPRF may benefit for patients with FS after 12 weeks treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of participant selection.

References

    1. Cui J, Lu W, He Y, et al. Molecular biology of frozen shoulder-induced limitation of shoulder joint movements. J Res Med Sci 2017;22:61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guyver PM, Bruce DJ, Rees JL. Frozen shoulder-a stiff problem that requires a flexible approach. Maturitas 2014;78:11–6. - PubMed
    1. Robinson CM, Seah KT, Chee YH, et al. Frozen shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012;94:1–9. - PubMed
    1. Kelley MJ, McClure PW, Leggin BG. Frozen shoulder: evidence and a proposed model guiding rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39:135–48. - PubMed
    1. Dias R, Cutts S, Massoud S. Frozen shoulder. BMJ 2005;331:1453–6. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types