Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 4;14(1):e0208926.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208926. eCollection 2019.

High prevalence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and abnormal liver stiffness in a young and obese Mexican population

Affiliations

High prevalence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and abnormal liver stiffness in a young and obese Mexican population

Maricruz Sepulveda-Villegas et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: To identify nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and liver stiffness in Mexican subjects with different body mass index (BMI).

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 505 adults. Risk for NASH was defined as the presence of one or more of the following biochemical and metabolic parameters (BMPs): fasting glucose ≥100 mg/dl, triglycerides (TG) ≥150 mg/dl, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) ≥2.5, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >54 IU/L and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >42 IU/L. Body mass index measurement and nutritional assessment were performed by standard procedures. Liver fibrosis stage was determined by liver stiffness measurement using transitional elastography (TE) or by liver biopsy (LB).

Results: Risk for NASH was 57% (290/505). Most BMPs values incremented by BMI category. Among 171 at-risk patients, 106 subjects were evaluated by TE and 65 subjects by LB. Abnormal liver stiffness (≥6.0 kPa) was prevalent in 54% (57/106) of the cases, whereas by LB, 91% (59/65) of patients with obesity had NASH and liver fibrosis. Furthermore, liver fibrosis was prevalent in 46% (6/13) in normal weight individuals, whereas 4.6% (3/65) of patients with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 showed no histopathological abnormalities. Overall, 67.8% (116/171) of the patients had abnormal liver stiffness or NASH. The normal weight patients with liver damage consumed relatively a higher fat-rich diet compared to the other groups whereas the remaining subgroups shared a similar dietary pattern.

Conclusion: Young patients with overweight and obesity showed a high prevalence of altered BMPs related to abnormal liver stiffness assessed by TE and NASH by LB. Early diagnostic strategies are required to detect the risk for NASH and avoid further liver damage in populations with a rising prevalence of obesity by defining the risk factors involved in the onset and progression of NASH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow diagram of the study.
BMP: biochemical and metabolic parameters; NASH: nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; TE: transient elastography.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Stage of fibrosis based on LSM by using TE.
F1: initial fibrosis; F2: intermediate fibrosis; F3: advanced fibrosis; F4: liver cirrhosis.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Representative images of histological staining of liver biopsy.
A) Steatosis grade was evaluated using Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS). B) The necroinflammatory grading comprised the presence of steatosis, ballooning, and inflammation evaluated by PAS and H&E. C) Masson´s trichrome stain was used to reveal fibrosis and architectural changes.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Grading of NASH according to histopathological findings.
NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NAFL: nonalcoholic fatty liver; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Stage of fibrosis evaluated by liver biopsy.
F0: absence of fibrosis; F1: perisinusoidal/pericellular fibrosis in zone 3; F2: zone 3 perisinusoidal/pericellular and periportal fibrosis; F3: focal or extensive bridging in zone 3 perisinusoidal and portal fibrosis; and F4: cirrhosis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mokdad AA, Lopez AD, Shahraz S, Lozano R, Mokdad AH, Stanaway J, et al. Liver cirrhosis mortality in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. BMC Med. 2014;12: 145 10.1186/s12916-014-0145-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Global Burden of Disease Liver Cancer Collaboration, Akinyemiju T, Abera S, Ahmed M, Alam N, Alemayohu MA, et al. The Burden of Primary Liver Cancer and Underlying Etiologies From 1990 to 2015 at the Global, Regional, and National Level: Results From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3:1683–1691. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3055 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roman S, Zepeda-Carrillo EA, Moreno-Luna LE, Panduro A. Alcoholism and liver disease in Mexico: Genetic and environmental factors. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19: 7972–82. 10.3748/wjg.v19.i44.7972 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stanciu C, Trifan A. Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Revolution: Eastern European Story. Hepat Mon. 2015;15: e28969 10.5812/hepatmon.28969v2 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robotin MC. Hepatitis B prevention and control: Lessons from the East and the West. World J Hepatol. 2011;3: 31–7. 10.4254/wjh.v3.i2.31 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms