Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 4;14(1):e0208384.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208384. eCollection 2019.

Crowdfunding scientific research: Descriptive insights and correlates of funding success

Henry Sauermann  1   2 , Chiara Franzoni  3 , Kourosh Shafi  4
Affiliations

Crowdfunding scientific research: Descriptive insights and correlates of funding success

Henry Sauermann et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Crowdfunding has gained traction as a mechanism to raise resources for entrepreneurial and artistic projects, yet there is little systematic evidence on the potential of crowdfunding for scientific research. We first briefly review prior research on crowdfunding and give an overview of dedicated platforms for crowdfunding research. We then analyze data from over 700 campaigns on the largest dedicated platform, Experiment.com. Our descriptive analysis provides insights regarding the creators seeking funding, the projects they are seeking funding for, and the campaigns themselves. We then examine how these characteristics relate to fundraising success. The findings highlight important differences between crowdfunding and traditional funding mechanisms for research, including high use by students and other junior investigators but also relatively small project size. Students and junior investigators are more likely to succeed than senior scientists, and women have higher success rates than men. Conventional signals of quality-including scientists' prior publications-have little relationship with funding success, suggesting that the crowd may apply different decision criteria than traditional funding agencies. Our results highlight significant opportunities for crowdfunding in the context of science while also pointing towards unique challenges. We relate our findings to research on the economics of science and on crowdfunding, and we discuss connections with other emerging mechanisms to involve the public in scientific research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Characteristics of project creators.
(A) Affiliation of all project creators (N = 1,131). (B) Position of creators who are affiliated with an educational institution (N = 912). Excludes cases with missing data.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Median targets, amounts raised, and amounts raised conditional upon funding success, by gender of first author (N = 691, in USD).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Median targets, amounts raised, and amounts raised conditional upon funding success, by position of first author (educational institutions only, other positions omitted) (N = 533, in USD).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Agrawal AK, Catalini C, Goldfarb A. Some simple economics of crowdfunding In: Lerner J, Stern S, editors. Innovation Policy and the Economy. 14: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2014. p. 63–97.
    1. Mollick E. The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing. 2014;29(1):1–16.
    1. Bruton G, Khavul S, Siegel D, Wright M. New financial alternatives in seeding entrepreneurship: Microfinance, crowdfunding, and peer-to-peer innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2015;39(1):9–26. 10.1111/etap.12143 - DOI
    1. Fleming L, Sorenson O. Financing by and for the Masses. California Management Review. 2016;58(2):5–19.
    1. Lin T. Scientists turn to crowds on the web to finance their projects. New York Times; 2011. July 11, 2011.