Early Risk Score for Predicting Hypotension in Normotensive Patients with Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleedin
- PMID: 30609708
- PMCID: PMC6352164
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm8010037
Early Risk Score for Predicting Hypotension in Normotensive Patients with Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleedin
Abstract
Risk assessment for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is important; however, current scoring systems are insufficient. We aimed to develop and validate a prediction model for rapidly determining the occurrence of hypotension in non-variceal UGIB patients with normotension (systolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg) at emergency department presentation. In this prospective observational cohort study, consecutive non-variceal UGIB patients between January 2012 and April 2017 were enrolled. We developed and validated a new prediction model through logistic regression, with the occurrence of hypotension <24 h as the primary outcome. Among 3363 UGIB patients, 1439 non-variceal UGIB patients were included. The risk factors for the occurrence of hypotension were lactate level, blood in nasogastric tube, and systolic blood pressure. The area under the curve (AUC) of the new scoring model (LBS-Lactate, Blood in nasogastric tube, Systolic blood pressure) in the development cohort was 0.74, higher than the value of 0.64 of the Glasgow⁻Blatchford score for predicting the occurrence of hypotension. The AUC of the LBS score in the validation cohort was 0.83. An LBS score of ≤2 had a negative predictive value of 99.5% and an LBS score of ≥7 had a specificity of 97.5% in the validation cohort. The new LBS score stratifies normotensive patients with non-variceal UGIB at risk for developing hypotension.
Keywords: hypotension; lactate; non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding; risk model.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
[Can Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Pre-endoscopic Rockall Score Predict the Occurrence of Hypotension in Initially Normotensive Patients with Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding?].Korean J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan 25;67(1):16-21. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2016.67.1.16. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 26809627 Korean.
-
Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;31(4):761-7. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13222. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016. PMID: 26514879
-
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding etiology score for predicting variceal and non-variceal bleeding.World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar 7;15(9):1099-104. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.1099. World J Gastroenterol. 2009. PMID: 19266603 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Scoring Systems in Predicting the Outcome of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding; a Narrative Review.Emerg (Tehran). 2017;5(1):e36. Epub 2017 Jan 11. Emerg (Tehran). 2017. PMID: 28286843 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) - initial evaluation and management.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;27(5):633-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Sep 25. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 24160923 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Lactate Clearance with Established Risk Assessment Tools in Predicting Outcomes in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 5;12(7):2716. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072716. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37048800 Free PMC article.
-
Immature Granulocyte Count and Percentage as New Predictors of Mortality in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep;24(9):794-798. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23563. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 33132562 Free PMC article.
-
Pulse pressure during the initial resuscitative period in patients with septic shock treated with a protocol-driven resuscitation bundle therapy.Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(4):924-931. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.056. Epub 2020 Aug 20. Korean J Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 32811131 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Analysis on Machine Learning and Deep Learning to Predict Post-Induction Hypotension.Sensors (Basel). 2020 Aug 14;20(16):4575. doi: 10.3390/s20164575. Sensors (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32824073 Free PMC article.
-
Association of inferior vena cava diameter ratio with outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding.Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;9(2):101-107. doi: 10.15441/ceem.21.099. Epub 2022 Jun 10. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2022. PMID: 35692092 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barkun A.N., Bardou M., Kuipers E.J., Sung J., Hunt R.H., Martel M., Sinclair P., International Consensus Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Conference Group International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann. Intern. Med. 2010;152:101–113. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-2-201001190-00009. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hyett B.H., Abougergi M.S., Charpentier J.P., Kumar N.L., Brozovic S., Claggett B.L., Travis A.C., Saltzman J.R. The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2013;77:551–557. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.11.022. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous