Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;35(9):1481-1490.
doi: 10.1007/s00381-018-4025-1. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

Cranioplasty after craniectomy in pediatric patients-a systematic review

Vita M Klieverik  1 , Kai J Miller  1 , Ash Singhal  2 , Kuo Sen Han  1 , Peter A Woerdeman  3
Affiliations

Cranioplasty after craniectomy in pediatric patients-a systematic review

Vita M Klieverik et al. Childs Nerv Syst. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: Complications following cranioplasty with either autografts or cranial implants are commonly reported in pediatric patients. However, data regarding cranioplasty strategies, complications and long-term outcomes are not well described. This study systematically reviews the literature for an overview of current cranioplasty practice in children.

Methods: A systematic review of articles published from inception to July 2018 was performed. Studies were included if they reported the specific use of cranioplasty materials following craniectomy in patients younger than 18 years of age, and had a minimum follow-up of at least 1 year.

Results: Twenty-four manuscripts, describing a total of 864 cranioplasty procedures, met the inclusion criteria. The age of patients in this aggregate ranged from 1 month to 20 years and the weighted average was 8.0 years. The follow-up ranged from 0.4 months to 18 years and had a weighted average of 40.4 months. Autologous bone grafts were used in 484 cases (56.0%). Resorption, infection and/or hydrocephalus were the most frequently mentioned complications. In this aggregate group, 61 patients needed a revision cranioplasty. However, in 6/13 (46%) papers studying autologous cranioplasties, no data was provided on resorption, infection and revision cranioplasty rates. Cranial implants were used in 380 cases (44.0%), with custom-made porous hydroxyapatite being the most commonly used material (100/380, 26.3%). Infection and migration/fracturing/loosening were the most frequently documented complications. Eleven revision cranioplasties were reported. Again, no data was reported on infection and revision cranioplasty rates, in 7/16 (44%) and 9/16 (56%) of papers, respectively.

Conclusion: Our systematic review illuminates that whether autografts or cranial implants are used, postcranioplasty complications are quite common. Beyond this, the existing literature does not contain well documented and comparable outcome parameters, suggesting that prospective, long-term multicenter cohort studies are needed to be able to optimize cranioplasty strategies in children who will undergo cranioplasty following craniectomy.

Keywords: Children; Craniectomy; Cranioplasty; Pediatric neurosurgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Oct;123(4):409-12 - PubMed
    1. Childs Nerv Syst. 2000 Nov;16(10-11):659-68 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2001 Mar;34(3):149-55 - PubMed
    1. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Mar;60(3):272-6 - PubMed
    1. Ann Plast Surg. 2002 Aug;49(2):127-32 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources