Ensuring Causal, Not Casual, Inference
- PMID: 30613853
- PMCID: PMC6760252
- DOI: 10.1007/s11121-018-0971-9
Ensuring Causal, Not Casual, Inference
Abstract
With innovation in causal inference methods and a rise in non-experimental data availability, a growing number of prevention researchers and advocates are thinking about causal inference. In this commentary, we discuss the current state of science as it relates to causal inference in prevention research, and reflect on key assumptions of these methods. We review challenges associated with the use of causal inference methodology, as well as considerations for hoping to integrate causal inference methods into their research. In short, this commentary addresses the key concepts of causal inference and suggests a greater emphasis on thoughtfully designed studies (to avoid the need for strong and potentially untestable assumptions) combined with analyses of sensitivity to those assumptions.
Keywords: Assumptions; Causal inference; Mediation; Randomized controlled trials.
References
-
- Angrist JD (2004). Treatment effect heterogeneity in theory and practice. The Economic Journal, 114(494), C52–C83.
-
- Angrist JD, Imbens GW, & Rubin DB (1996). Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(434), 444–455.
-
- Ding M, Chen Y, and Bressler SL (2006). Granger causality: Basic theory and application to neuroscience. In Handbook of Time Series Analysis: Recent Theoretical Developments and Applications (pp. 437–460).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
