Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr;20(3):452-456.
doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0971-9.

Ensuring Causal, Not Casual, Inference

Affiliations

Ensuring Causal, Not Casual, Inference

Rashelle J Musci et al. Prev Sci. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

With innovation in causal inference methods and a rise in non-experimental data availability, a growing number of prevention researchers and advocates are thinking about causal inference. In this commentary, we discuss the current state of science as it relates to causal inference in prevention research, and reflect on key assumptions of these methods. We review challenges associated with the use of causal inference methodology, as well as considerations for hoping to integrate causal inference methods into their research. In short, this commentary addresses the key concepts of causal inference and suggests a greater emphasis on thoughtfully designed studies (to avoid the need for strong and potentially untestable assumptions) combined with analyses of sensitivity to those assumptions.

Keywords: Assumptions; Causal inference; Mediation; Randomized controlled trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Angrist JD (2004). Treatment effect heterogeneity in theory and practice. The Economic Journal, 114(494), C52–C83.
    1. Angrist JD, Imbens GW, & Rubin DB (1996). Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(434), 444–455.
    1. Austin PC, & Stuart EA (2015). Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Statistics in Medicine, 34(28), 3661–3679. 10.1002/sim.6607 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bray BC, Dziak JJ, Oatrick ME, and Lanza ST (2018). Inverse propensity score weighting with a latent class exposure: Estimating the causal effect of reported reasons for alcohol use on problem alcohol use 16 years later. Prevention Science - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ding M, Chen Y, and Bressler SL (2006). Granger causality: Basic theory and application to neuroscience. In Handbook of Time Series Analysis: Recent Theoretical Developments and Applications (pp. 437–460).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources