Oral faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in a dog: a case report
- PMID: 30616615
- PMCID: PMC6322325
- DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1754-z
Oral faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in a dog: a case report
Abstract
Background: Successful clinical outcomes of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection have been reported in humans and a marmoset. However, it has been unclear whether oral FMT was effective for the treatment of C. difficile-associated diarrhoea in dogs.
Case presentation: An 8-month-old, intact male French bulldog was presented with a 4-month history of intermittent large bowel diarrhoea. Physical and clinical examinations did not identify any specific causes for diarrhoea. Real-time PCR analysis and immunochromatography detected C. difficile antigen and toxin A&B genes and proteins in a faecal sample. Based on these findings, diarrhoea in the dog was considered to be induced by C. difficile-associated colitis. The dog was treated with oral FMT, in which a faecal solution obtained from a healthy beagle was orally administered to the subject. Stool consistency and frequency and faecal blood and mucus became normal 2-3 days after oral FMT, and real-time PCR analysis and immunochromatography was negative for C. difficile antigen and toxin A&B genes and proteins. No adverse events were observed.
Conclusion: The present case report demonstrated that oral FMT was an effective treatment for C. difficile-associated diarrhoea in a dog. The findings in this report provide a rationale to evaluate clinical efficacy of oral FMT for other gastrointestinal diseases in dogs.
Keywords: Clostridium difficile; Diarrhoea; Dog; Oral faecal microbiota transplantation.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology (0016018).
Consent for publication
Written informed consent for publication of the clinical details was obtained from the owner of the dog.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
-
- Marks SL. Enteric bacterial diseases. In: Ettinger SJ, Feldman EC, Côté E, editors. Textbook of veterinary internal medicine. 8. Missouri: Elsevier; 2017. pp. 957–962.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical