Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 7;9(1):e023596.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023596.

Measuring patient-centred system performance: a scoping review of patient-centred care quality indicators

Affiliations

Measuring patient-centred system performance: a scoping review of patient-centred care quality indicators

Maria-Jose Santana et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The shift to the patient-centred care (PCC) model as a healthcare delivery paradigm calls for systematic measurement and evaluation. In an attempt to develop patient-centred quality indicators (PC-QIs), this study aimed to identify quality indicators that can be used to measure PCC.

Methods: Design: scoping review.

Data sources: studies were identified through searching seven electronic databases and the grey literature. Search terms included quality improvement, quality indicators, healthcare quality and PCC. Eligibility Criteria: articles were included if they mentioned development and/or implementation of PC-QIs.

Data extraction and synthesis: extracted data included study characteristics (country, year of publication and type of study/article), patients' inclusion in the development of indicators and type of patient populations and point of care if applicable (eg, in-patient, out-patient and primary care).

Results: A total 184 full-text peer-reviewed articles were assessed for eligibility for inclusion; of these, 9 articles were included in this review. From the non-peer-reviewed literature, eight documents met the criteria for inclusion in this study. This review revealed the heterogeneity describing and defining the nature of PC-QIs. Most PC-QIs were presented as PCC measures and identified as guidelines, surveys or recommendations, and therefore cannot be classified as actual PC-QIs. Out of 502 ways to measure PCC, only 25 were considered to be actual PC-QIs. None of the identified articles implemented the quality indicators in care settings.

Conclusion: The identification of PC-QIs is a key first step in laying the groundwork to develop evidence-based PC-QIs. Research is needed to continue the development and implementation of PC-QIs for healthcare quality improvement.

Keywords: healthcare quality; patient-centred care; quality improvement; quality indicators.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram for study inclusion. PC-QIs, patient-centred quality indicators.

References

    1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century: National Academy Press, 2001. - PubMed
    1. Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open 2013;3:e001570 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001570 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oates J, Weston WW, Jordan J. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. Fam Pract 2000;49:796–804. - PubMed
    1. Fung CH, Lim Y-W, Mattke S, et al. Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care. Ann Intern Med 2008;148:111–23. 10.7326/0003-4819-148-2-200801150-00006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Epstein RM, Fiscella K, Lesser CS, et al. Why the nation needs a policy push on patient-centered health care. Health Aff 2010;29:1489–95. 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0888 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources