Characterization of Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis Receiving Secukinumab and Reasons for Initiating Treatment: A US Physician Survey and Retrospective Medical Chart Review
- PMID: 30617811
- PMCID: PMC6423254
- DOI: 10.1007/s40801-018-0146-9
Characterization of Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis Receiving Secukinumab and Reasons for Initiating Treatment: A US Physician Survey and Retrospective Medical Chart Review
Abstract
Objectives: To characterize US patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who were treated with secukinumab and to assess rheumatologist-reported reasons for prescribing treatment in clinical practice.
Methods: This descriptive analysis of data from a US retrospective medical chart review included patients aged ≥ 18 years diagnosed with AS who initiated secukinumab after 15 January 2016. Eligible rheumatologists used online forms to collect patient demographics, disease characteristics, co-morbidity profile, and treatment history prior to or on the index date, defined as the date of the first secukinumab prescription recorded in the medical chart. Information on physician-level characteristics and reasons for secukinumab prescription and dosing were also collected.
Results: Medical charts from 78 patients with AS who initiated secukinumab were reviewed by 25 rheumatologists between 7 July 2017 and 11 August 2017. Overall, 76.9% of patients were male, mean (SD) age was 39.8 (10.8) years, and 34.6% were biologic naïve. The most common reasons for secukinumab initiation among biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients, respectively, were efficacy/effectiveness (77.8%) and failure of other prior biologics (84.3%). Nearly all patients (94.9%) received a loading dose, including 150 mg every week (39.7%), 300 mg every week (53.8%), and other (1.3%). Overall, 73 patients (93.6%) received ≥ 1 maintenance secukinumab dose, of whom 56.2% and 43.8% received 150 mg and 300 mg, respectively, every 4 weeks.
Conclusions: In this US medical chart review of patients with AS who initiated secukinumab, approximately one-third were biologic naïve, and secukinumab efficacy/effectiveness and failure of other biologics were the most common reasons for initiating secukinumab.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest
R. Joshi has received consulting fees from Novartis. D. Latremouille-Viau, M. K. Meiselbach, and J. Xie are employees of Analysis Group, Inc. Y. Park is an employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. P. Sunkureddi has received consulting and speakers’ bureau fees from Novartis, and is an investigator of a clinical trial sponsored by Novartis.
Research involving human participants
An institutional review board exemption was obtained for the study prior to initiation of data collection.
Informed consent
Informed consent was not required in this study because the data collected did not contain personal identifiers.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Characteristics of Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Receiving Secukinumab and Reasons for Initiation: A US Retrospective Medical Chart Review.Rheumatol Ther. 2019 Mar;6(1):89-100. doi: 10.1007/s40744-018-0137-z. Epub 2019 Jan 5. Rheumatol Ther. 2019. PMID: 30612321 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term efficacy and safety of secukinumab 150 mg in ankylosing spondylitis: 5-year results from the phase III MEASURE 1 extension study.RMD Open. 2019 Sep 3;5(2):e001005. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001005. eCollection 2019. RMD Open. 2019. PMID: 31565244 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of secukinumab in ankylosing spondylitis from the Canadian perspective.J Med Econ. 2019 Jan;22(1):45-52. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1539400. Epub 2018 Nov 13. J Med Econ. 2019. PMID: 30346844
-
A cost per responder analysis of secukinumab vs adalimumab for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis from the Korean perspective.Int J Rheum Dis. 2019 Sep;22(9):1630-1637. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13635. Epub 2019 Jun 18. Int J Rheum Dis. 2019. PMID: 31215166
-
Profile of secukinumab in the treatment of psoriasis: current perspectives.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015 Dec 2;11:1767-77. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S79053. eCollection 2015. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015. PMID: 26664127 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Current Concepts and Medical Management for Patients with Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis.Hip Pelvis. 2024 Dec 1;36(4):234-249. doi: 10.5371/hp.2024.36.4.234. Hip Pelvis. 2024. PMID: 39620565 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Health care utilization and cost associated with switching biologics within the first year of biologic treatment initiation among patients with ankylosing spondylitis.J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jan;27(1):27-36. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.19433. Epub 2020 Oct 12. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021. PMID: 33043820 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials