Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 20:9:720.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00720. eCollection 2018.

A 4-Day Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Behavioral Intervention Program for CFS/ME. An Open Study, With 1-Year Follow-Up

Affiliations

A 4-Day Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Behavioral Intervention Program for CFS/ME. An Open Study, With 1-Year Follow-Up

Bjarte Stubhaug et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalopathy (CFS/ME) is an incapacitating illness in which single treatment interventions seem to have variable effects. Based on an earlier study we have conducted a new study with a concentrated intervention program. The aims of this study were to: (1) explore the clinical course for patients with CFS/ME who participated in a treatment program delivered during four consecutive days, and (2) evaluate their satisfaction with this program. Methods: 305 patients diagnosed with CFS/ME (Oxford criteria), recruited from a clinical population referred to a specialist outpatient clinic, participated in an open uncontrolled study of the clinical course through 1 year. The study group participated in a 4-day group intervention program, comprised by education, cognitive group therapy sessions, mindfulness sessions, physical activity and writing sessions, within a context of cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness, acceptance and commitment model. Assessments were done by self-reports prior to the first consultation, 1 week before and 1 week after the intervention program, and at 3 months and 1 year after the intervention. SPSS 23 and R 3.3 were used for statistical analyses. The associations between case definitions and the outcome measures (Chalder Fatigue Scale (FS), Short Form 36 (SF-36) physical functioning scale) were assessed by a linear mixed effects model (LME). Results: Results showed statistically significant clinical changes for 80% of the patients after the intervention, changes being sustained through 1 year after the program. For both Fatigue Scale (FS) and the SF-36 there were statistically significant effects of time from baseline to all time points with a statistically significant drop in scores, applying the linear mixed effects model. A subgroup fulfilling the inclusion criteria from the PACE study (Chalder Fatigue Scale >6/11, SF-36 Physical functioning <65/100) showed clinically significant improvement through 1 year, changes in outcome measures were statistically significant (p < 0.001). None of the patients included in the program dropped out, and a great majority of patients expressed high satisfaction with the content, focus and amount of treatment. Conclusion: Clinical changes observed from pre-treatment to 1 year follow-up could represent effects of the 4-day concentrated intervention program, and should be further explored in a controlled study.

Keywords: 4-day concentrated treatment program; CFS/ME; acceptance and commitment therapy; chronic fatigue syndrome; cognitive behavioral therapy; myalgic encephalopathy; stress reduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in outcome measures by timeline and case definitions CFS.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Acceptance and satisfaction with treatment program (CSQ-8). How would you rate the quality of service you have received?: 3.5 (SD = 0.6). Did you get the kind of service you wanted?: 3.4 (SD = 0.5). To what extent has our program met your needs?: 3.2 (SD = 0.7). If a friend were in need of similar help, would you recommend our program to him or her? 3.8 (SD = 0.4). How satisfied are you with the amount of help you have received?:3.5 (SD = 0.5). Have the services you received helped you to deal more effectively with your problems?: 3.5 (SD = 0.6). In an overall, general sense, how satisfied are you with the service you have received?:3.6 (SD = 0.5). If you were to seek help again, would you come back to our program? 3.7 (SD = 0.5).

References

    1. Afari N, Buchwald D. Chronic fatigue syndrome: a review. Am J Psychiatry (2003) 160:221–36. 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.2.221 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prins JB, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Lancet (2006) 367:346–55. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68073-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Committee on the Diagnostic Criteria for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Medicine of Medicine Beyond Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Redefining an Illness. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US) (2015). - PubMed
    1. Jason LA, Sunnquist M, Brown A, Newton JL, Strand EB, Vernon SD. Chronic fatigue syndrome versus systemic exertion intolerance disease. Fatigue (2015) 3:127–41. 10.1080/21641846.2015.1051291 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brurberg KG, Fonhus MS, Larun L, Flottorp S, Malterud K. Case definitions for chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME): a systematic review. BMJ Open (2014) 4:e003973. 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003973 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources