Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Dec 17:9:2940.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02940. eCollection 2018.

Gene Editing of HIV-1 Co-receptors to Prevent and/or Cure Virus Infection

Affiliations
Review

Gene Editing of HIV-1 Co-receptors to Prevent and/or Cure Virus Infection

Alexander G Allen et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Antiretroviral therapy has prolonged the lives of people living with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), transforming the disease into one that can be controlled with lifelong therapy. The search for an HIV-1 vaccine has plagued researchers for more than three decades with little to no success from clinical trials. Due to these failures, scientists have turned to alternative methods to develop next generation therapeutics that could allow patients to live with HIV-1 without the need for daily medication. One method that has been proposed has involved the use of a number of powerful gene editing tools; Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFN), Transcription Activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 to edit the co-receptors (CCR5 or CXCR4) required for HIV-1 to infect susceptible target cells efficiently. Initial safety studies in patients have shown that editing the CCR5 locus is safe. More in depth in vitro studies have shown that editing the CCR5 locus was able to inhibit infection from CCR5-utilizing virus, but CXCR4-utilizing virus was still able to infect cells. Additional research efforts were then aimed at editing the CXCR4 locus, but this came with other safety concerns. However, in vitro studies have since confirmed that CXCR4 can be edited without killing cells and can confer resistance to CXCR4-utilizing HIV-1. Utilizing these powerful new gene editing technologies in concert could confer cellular resistance to HIV-1. While the CD4, CCR5, CXCR4 axis for cell-free infection has been the most studied, there are a plethora of reports suggesting that the cell-to-cell transmission of HIV-1 is significantly more efficient. These reports also indicated that while broadly neutralizing antibodies are well suited with respect to blocking cell-free infection, cell-to-cell transmission remains refractile to this approach. In addition to stopping cell-free infection, gene editing of the HIV-1 co-receptors could block cell-to-cell transmission. This review aims to summarize what has been shown with regard to editing the co-receptors needed for HIV-1 entry and how they could impact the future of HIV-1 therapeutic and prevention strategies.

Keywords: CCR5; CD4; CRISPR/Cas9; CXCR4; HIV-1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic breakdown of gene editing strategies targeting CCR5 or CXCR4. Once the HIV-1 glycoprotein gp120 has made contact with CD4 it undergoes a series of conformational changes that allow it to bind to one of two co-receptors (CCR5 or CXCR4). This normally leads to T-cell death within 24– 48 h (left). By customizing either the Cas9 or ZFN system these endonuclease enzymes can be packaged into viral vectors and transduced into their target cells (middle). Upon successful genome editing these target cells can be rendered resistant to either CCR5- or CXCR4-utilizing virus (right). Gray viral particles indicate CCR5-utilizing virus (R5) while the red viral particles indicate an CXCR4-utilizing virus (X4).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Timeline of CCR5 genetic editing. History of studies uncovering the CCR5Δ32 mutation, and landmark investigations modifying the CCR5 receptor.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Genome editing of CCR5 resulting in a heterogeneous population. For simplicity only CCR5 gene editing has been presented. While generating modified CD4+ T cells, not all cells will be successfully edited generating a mixed population (top, right). During this time HIV-1 will be able to replicate in cells that are CCR5+ and indirectly select for cells that are CCR5- (bottom, right).

References

    1. Abrahams M. R., Anderson J. A., Giorgi E. E., Seoighe C., Mlisana K., Ping L. H., et al. (2009). Quantitating the multiplicity of infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype C reveals a non-poisson distribution of transmitted variants. J. Virol. 83 3556–3567. 10.1128/JVI.02132-08 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agosto L. M., Uchil P. D., Mothes W. (2015). HIV cell-to-cell transmission: effects on pathogenesis and antiretroviral therapy. Trends Microbiol. 23 289–295. 10.1016/j.tim.2015.02.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agosto L. M., Zhong P., Munro J., Mothes W. (2014). Highly active antiretroviral therapies are effective against HIV-1 cell-to-cell transmission. PLoS Pathog. 10:e1003982. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003982 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alkhatib G., Combadiere C., Broder C. C., Feng Y., Kennedy P. E., Murphy P. M., et al. (1996). CC CKR5: a RANTES, MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta receptor as a fusion cofactor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1. Science 272 1955–1958. 10.1126/science.272.5270.1955 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allers K., Hutter G., Hofmann J., Loddenkemper C., Rieger K., Thiel E., et al. (2011). Evidence for the cure of HIV infection by CCR5-Delta32/Delta32 stem cell transplantation. Blood 117 2791–2799. 10.1182/blood-2010-09-309591 - DOI - PubMed