Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 11:9:1829.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01829. eCollection 2018.

Genetic Diversity and Resistance to Fusarium Head Blight in Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat Derived From Aegilops tauschii and Diverse Triticum turgidum Subspecies

Affiliations

Genetic Diversity and Resistance to Fusarium Head Blight in Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat Derived From Aegilops tauschii and Diverse Triticum turgidum Subspecies

Agnes Szabo-Hever et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Synthetic hexaploid wheat (SHW) can serve as a bridge for the transfer of useful genes from Aegilops tauschii and tetraploid wheat (Triticum turgidum) into common wheat (T. aestivum). The objective of this study was to evaluate 149 SHW lines and their 74 tetraploid parents for their genetic diversity, breeding values and inter-genomic interactions for resistance to Fusarium head blight (FHB). The genetic diversity analysis was performed based on the population structure established using 4,674 and 3,330 polymorphic SNP markers among the SHW lines and tetraploid parents, respectively. The results showed that all T. carthlicum and most T. dicoccum accessions formed different clusters and subpopulations, respectively, whereas all the T. durum, T. polonicum, T. turgidum, and T. turanicum accessions were clustered together, suggesting that T. durum was more closely related to T. polonicum, T. turgidum, and T. turanicum than to T. dicoccum. The genetic diversity of the SHW lines mainly reflected that of the tetraploid parents. The SHW lines and their tetraploid parents were evaluated for reactions to FHB in two greenhouse seasons and at two field nurseries for 2 years. As expected, most of the SHW lines were more resistant than their tetraploid parents in all environments. The FHB severities of the SHW lines varied greatly depending on the Ae. tauschii and tetraploid genotypes involved. Most of the SHW lines with a high level of FHB resistance were generally derived from the tetraploid accessions with a high level of FHB resistance. Among the 149 SHW lines, 140 were developed by using three Ae. tauschii accessions CIae 26, PI 268210, and RL 5286. These SHW lines showed FHB severities reduced by 21.7%, 17.3%, and 11.5%, respectively, with an average reduction of 18.3%, as compared to the tetraploid parents, suggesting that the D genome may play a major role in reducing disease severity in the SHW lines. Thirteen SHW lines consistently showed a high level of FHB resistance compared to the resistant check, Sumai 3, in each environment. These SHW lines will be useful for the development of FHB-resistant wheat germplasm and populations for discovery of novel FHB resistance genes.

Keywords: Aegilops tauschii; Fusarium head blight; Triticum turgidum; genetic diversity; synthetic hexaploid wheat; tetraploid wheat; wheat.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Dendrogram of the 73 tetraploid parents, forming three major clusters. Cluster 1 incluides one T. dicoccum and 21 T. cathlicum accesions. Cluster 2a consists of 34 T. dicoccum accesions. Cluster 2b contains all durum, T. polonicum, T. turgidum, and T. turanicum accessions. Accession T. dicoccum CItr 14133-1 is an outlier.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Dendrogram of the 149 SHW lines, forming three major clusters. Cluster 1 consists of 43 SHW lines derived from the accessions in the tetraploid wheat cluster 1. Cluster 2 contains 30 SHW lines corresponding to tetraploid wheat cluster 2b and the outlier T. dicoccum CItr 14133-1. Cluster 3 contains 76 SHW lines belonging to the tetraploid wheat cluster 2a.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Distribution of Fusarium head blight (FHB) disease severities among the tetraploid wheat lines in the three environments (FHB15, FHB16, and FHBGH). Letter “P” represents probability from normality test for distribution of disease severity.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Distribution of Fusarium head blight (FHB) disease severities among the SHW lines in the three environments (FHB15, FHB16, and FHBGH). The two checks, Sumai 3 and Grandin, were included in the data set. Letter “P” represents probability from normality test for distribution of disease severity.

References

    1. Anderson J. A., Churchill G. A., Autrique J. E., Tanksley S. D., Sorrells M. E. (1993). Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps. Genome 36 181–186. 10.1139/g93-024 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arora S., Steuernagel B., Chandramohan S., Long Y., Matny O., Johnson R., et al. (2018). Resistance gene discovery and cloning by sequence capture and association genetics. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1101/248146 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Börner A., Ogbonnaya F. C., Röder M. S., Rasheed A., Periyannan S., Lagudah E. S. (2015). “Aegilops tauschii introgressions in wheat,” in Alien Introgression in Wheat: Cytogenetics, Molecular Biology, and Genomics, eds Molnár-Láng M., Ceoloni C., Dolezel J. (London: Springer; ), 245–272.
    1. Bradbury P. J., Zhang Z., Kroon D. E., Casstevens T. M., Ramdoss Y., Buckler E. S. (2007). TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23 2633–2635. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brisco E. I., Brown L. K., Olson E. L. (2017). Fusarium head blight resistance in Aegilops tauschii. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 64 2049–2058. 10.1007/s10722-017-0495-3 - DOI