Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;37(4):366-372.
doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.18.0044. Epub 2018 Dec 31.

Effectiveness of inactivated hantavirus vaccine on the disease severity of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome

Affiliations

Effectiveness of inactivated hantavirus vaccine on the disease severity of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome

Yongjin Yi et al. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Background: An inactivated Hantaan virus vaccine (iHV) has been broadly used as a preventive strategy for hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) by the South Korean Army. After the vaccination program was initiated, the overall incidence of HFRS cases was reduced in the military population. While there are about 400 HFRS cases annually, few studies have demonstrated the efficacy of the iHV in field settings. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the iHV efficacy on HFRS severity.

Methods: From 2009 to 2017, HFRS cases were collected in South Korean Army hospitals along with patients' vaccination history. HFRS patients were classified retrospectively into two groups according to vaccination records: no history of iHV vaccination and valid vaccination. Vaccine efficacy on the severity of acute kidney injury (AKI) stage and dialysis events were investigated.

Results: The effects of the iHV on renal injury severity in between 18 valid vaccinated and 110 non-vaccinated patients were respectively evaluated. In the valid vaccination group, six of the 18 HFRS patients (33.3%) had stage 3 AKI, compared to 60 of the 110 (54.5%) patients in the non-vaccination group. The iHV efficacy against disease progression (VEp) was 58.1% (95% confidence interval, 31.3% to 88.0%).

Conclusion: The iHV efficacy against the progression of HFRS failed to demonstrate statistically significant protection. However, different severity profiles were observed between the iHV and non-vaccination groups. Additional studies with larger populations are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the iHV in patients with HFRS.

Keywords: Acute kidney injury; Disease progression; Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome; Preventive medicine; Viral vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of patient disposition. Hantavax®; Korea Green Cross, Seoul, Korea.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hart CA, Bennett M. Hantavirus infections: epidemiology and pathogenesis. Microbes Infect. 1999;1:1229–1237. doi: 10.1016/S1286-4579(99)00238-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee HW, Lee PW, Johnson KM. Isolation of the etiologic agent of Korean hemorrhagic fever. J Infect Dis. 1978;137:298–308. doi: 10.1093/infdis/137.3.298. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bi Z, Formenty PB, Roth CE. Hantavirus infection: a review and global update. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2008;2:3–23. doi: 10.3855/jidc.317. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Muranyi W, Bahr U, Zeier M, van der Woude FJ. Hantavirus infection. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3669–3679. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005050561. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baek LJ, Kariwa H, Lokugamage K, et al. Soochong virus: an antigenically and genetically distinct hantavirus isolated from Apodemus peninsulae in Korea. J Med Virol. 2006;78:290–297. doi: 10.1002/jmv.20538. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources