Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation Following Lich-Gregoir Technique for the Correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux Retrospective Comparative Study Open vs. Laparoscopy
- PMID: 30619786
- PMCID: PMC6305429
- DOI: 10.3389/fped.2018.00388
Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation Following Lich-Gregoir Technique for the Correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux Retrospective Comparative Study Open vs. Laparoscopy
Abstract
Introduction: The aim is to compare the outcome of open versus laparoscopic Lich-Gregoir technique in patients with vesicoureteral reflux. We report a retrospective multicenter comparative study between open and laparoscopic extra-vesical ureteral reimplantation (EVUR) following Lich-Gregoir (LG) technique for the correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux (VUR). Materials and Methods: Between January 2007 and December 2015, 96 patients with VUR (69 females and 27 males) and deterioration of the renal function, underwent EVUR following LG technique. Fifty patients (16 males and 34 females) were operated by open surgery (group A). The mean age was 4.22 years-old, (14-147 months). Laparoscopic approach (group B) was performed in 46 patients (11 males and 35 females). The mean age was 4.19 years-old (15-110 months). We compared the results in relation to degree of VUR, operative time, hospital stay, post-operative pain medications, recovery time, complications, successful rate, recurrence, and follow-up. Statistical analysis was done used Chi square test for categorical variables and the Student t-test for continuous variables. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: In both groups no correlation was identified between age or weight and operative time, length of stay or total analgesia used. The mean operative time for group A was 63.2 and 125.4 min for unilateral and bilateral VUR, respectively, and for the group B was 127.90 and 184.5 min, respectively. There was no conversion in the laparoscopic group. Perioperative mucosal perforation of the bladder occurred in 6 patients of group A and 4 patients of group B and was immediately repaired. One patient had to be reoperated for leakage in group B. The mean duration of Morphine, IV and PO analgesia was shorter in group B. The mean hospital stay was 5.46 days for group A and 1.54 days for Group B. The success rate was 98% in group A and 97, 8% in group B. The mean follow-up was 3.67 years for the open and 1.54 years for the laparoscopic group. Transitory voiding dysfunction occurred in bilateral EVUR in one case in each group. Conclusion: Laparoscopic or Open approach for the correction of VUR following Lich-Gregoir technique is effective in unilateral and bilateral VUR with similar results. Laparoscopic approach reduces significantly (p < 0.05 in each item) post-operative pain medication, hospital stay, and allows for a faster return to normal activity.
Keywords: Lich Gregoir; comparative study; laparoscopy; open; vesicoureteral reflux.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparison of intravesical (Cohen) and extravesical (Lich-Gregoir) ureteroneocystostomy in the treatment of unilateral primary vesicoureteric reflux in children.J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Feb;14(1):65.e1-65.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Oct 14. J Pediatr Urol. 2018. PMID: 29146303
-
Laparoscopic vesico-ureteral reimplantation with Lich-Gregoir approach in children: medium term results of 159 renal units in 117 children.World J Urol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1791-1798. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2064-y. Epub 2017 Jun 21. World J Urol. 2017. PMID: 28638940
-
Laparoscopic extravesical transperitoneal approach following the lich-gregoir procedure in refluxing duplicated collecting systems: initial experience.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 Mar;21(2):165-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0127. Epub 2010 Dec 29. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011. PMID: 21190482
-
Surgical management of vesicoureteral reflux in pediatric patients.World J Urol. 2004 Jun;22(2):96-106. doi: 10.1007/s00345-004-0408-x. Epub 2004 Jun 18. World J Urol. 2004. PMID: 15221260 Review.
-
Extravesical vs. intravesical ureteric reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Pediatr. 2022 Oct 21;10:935082. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.935082. eCollection 2022. Front Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 36340705 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Initial experience of a simplified modified Politano-Leadbetter technique for pneumovesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation in children.Transl Pediatr. 2025 Jul 31;14(7):1520-1529. doi: 10.21037/tp-2025-200. Epub 2025 Jul 28. Transl Pediatr. 2025. PMID: 40800179 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Urethral Sound to Facilitate Locating Retrovesical Ureter for Politano-Leadbetter Pneumovesicoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation.Front Pediatr. 2022 Mar 3;10:834465. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.834465. eCollection 2022. Front Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 35311041 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative study of open, laparoscopic and endoscopic treatments of intermediate grade vesicoureteral reflux in children.Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):2682-2687. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08985-y. Epub 2022 Nov 22. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 36414870
-
Robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction for managing kidney transplant patients with ureteric complications.Investig Clin Urol. 2025 Jan;66(1):18-26. doi: 10.4111/icu.20240308. Investig Clin Urol. 2025. PMID: 39791581 Free PMC article.
-
Vesicoscopic Cross-Trigonal Ureteral Reimplantation for Vesicoureteral Reflux: Intermediate Results.Children (Basel). 2022 Feb 21;9(2):298. doi: 10.3390/children9020298. Children (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35205018 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources