Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Dec 12:6:363.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00363. eCollection 2018.

Advances in Clinical Sample Preparation for Identification and Characterization of Bacterial Pathogens Using Metagenomics

Affiliations
Review

Advances in Clinical Sample Preparation for Identification and Characterization of Bacterial Pathogens Using Metagenomics

Nathan L Bachmann et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) plays an increasing role in communicable disease control through high-resolution outbreak tracing, laboratory surveillance and diagnostics. However, WGS has traditionally relied on microbial culture in order to obtain pathogen specific DNA for sequencing. This has severely limited the application of whole genome sequencing on pathogens with fastidious culturing requirements. In addition, the widespread adoption of culture-independent diagnostic tests has reduced availability of cultured isolates for confirmatory testing and surveillance. These recent developments have created demand for the implementation of techniques enabling direct sequencing of microbial genomes in clinical samples without having to culture an isolate. However, sequencing of specific organisms from clinical samples can be affected by high levels of contaminating DNA from the host and other commensal microorganisms. Several methods have been introduced for selective lysis of host cells and/or separate specific organisms from a clinical sample. This review examines the different approaches for sample preparation that have been used in diagnostic and public health laboratories for metagenomic sequencing.

Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; bacterial pathogens; culture-independent genome sequencing; metagenomic; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Methods of collecting bacterial gDNA and depleting host DNA. (1) Microbial separation involves pulling out bacterial cells using magnetic beads coated with antibodies from mixed samples followed by DNA extraction. (2) Differential lysis methods use selective agents to lysis host cells and then degrading the exposed host DNA before extracting bacterial DNA. (3) Targeted sequence capture approaches use magnetic beads that can hybridized to bacterial DNA to isolated specific sequences from a mixed sample post-DNA extraction. DNA enrichment methods can be used to bulk up the remaining DNA.

References

    1. Sintchenko V, Iredell JR, Gilbert GL. Pathogen profiling for disease management and surveillance. Nat Rev Microbiol. (2007) 5:464–70. 10.1038/nrmicro1656 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kwong JC, McCallum N, Sintchenko V, Howden BP. Whole genome sequencing in clinical and public health microbiology. Pathology (2015) 47:199–210. 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000235 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sintchenko V, Holmes EC. The role of pathogen genomics in assessing disease transmission. BMJ (2015) 350:h1314. 10.1136/bmj.h1314 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gilmour MW, Graham M, Reimer A, Van Domselaar G. Public health genomics and the new molecular epidemiology of bacterial pathogens. Public Health Genomics (2013) 16:25–30. 10.1159/000342709 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walker TM, Kohl TA, Omar SV, Hedge J, Del Ojo Elias C, Bradley P, et al. . Whole-genome sequencing for prediction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug susceptibility and resistance: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. (2015) 15:1193–202. 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00062-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources