Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy
- PMID: 30620059
- PMCID: PMC6492154
- DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11051
Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy
Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist has fostered safe practice for 10 years, yet its place in emergency surgery has not been assessed on a global scale. The aim of this study was to evaluate reported checklist use in emergency settings and examine the relationship with perioperative mortality in patients who had emergency laparotomy.
Methods: In two multinational cohort studies, adults undergoing emergency laparotomy were compared with those having elective gastrointestinal surgery. Relationships between reported checklist use and mortality were determined using multivariable logistic regression and bootstrapped simulation.
Results: Of 12 296 patients included from 76 countries, 4843 underwent emergency laparotomy. After adjusting for patient and disease factors, checklist use before emergency laparotomy was more common in countries with a high Human Development Index (HDI) (2455 of 2741, 89·6 per cent) compared with that in countries with a middle (753 of 1242, 60·6 per cent; odds ratio (OR) 0·17, 95 per cent c.i. 0·14 to 0·21, P < 0·001) or low (363 of 860, 42·2 per cent; OR 0·08, 0·07 to 0·10, P < 0·001) HDI. Checklist use was less common in elective surgery than for emergency laparotomy in high-HDI countries (risk difference -9·4 (95 per cent c.i. -11·9 to -6·9) per cent; P < 0·001), but the relationship was reversed in low-HDI countries (+12·1 (+7·0 to +17·3) per cent; P < 0·001). In multivariable models, checklist use was associated with a lower 30-day perioperative mortality (OR 0·60, 0·50 to 0·73; P < 0·001). The greatest absolute benefit was seen for emergency surgery in low- and middle-HDI countries.
Conclusion: Checklist use in emergency laparotomy was associated with a significantly lower perioperative mortality rate. Checklist use in low-HDI countries was half that in high-HDI countries.
© 2019 The Authors. BJS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.
Figures



Comment in
-
Correspondence.Br J Surg. 2019 May;106(6):802. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11195. Br J Surg. 2019. PMID: 30973989 No abstract available.
-
Correspondence.Br J Surg. 2019 May;106(6):802-803. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11194. Br J Surg. 2019. PMID: 30973992 No abstract available.
References
-
- Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD, Haynes AB, Lipsitz SR, Berry WR et al An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet 2008; 372: 139–144. - PubMed
-
- Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L, Alkire BC, Alonso N, Ameh EA et al Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet 2015; 386: 569–624. - PubMed
-
- WHO and Patient Safety . Implementation Manual: WHO Surgical Safety Checklist 2009: Safe Surgery Saves Lives. WHO: Geneva, 2009.
-
- Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP et al A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 491–499. - PubMed
-
- Wilson RM, Michel P, Olsen S, Gibberd RW, Vincent C, Rasslan O et al Patient safety in developing countries: retrospective estimation of scale and nature of harm to patients in hospital. BMJ 2012; 344: e832. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical