Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2019 Mar;43(3):522-530.
doi: 10.1111/acer.13953. Epub 2019 Feb 3.

Association Between Gabapentin Receipt for Any Indication and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption Scores Among Clinical Subpopulations With and Without Alcohol Use Disorder

Affiliations
Observational Study

Association Between Gabapentin Receipt for Any Indication and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption Scores Among Clinical Subpopulations With and Without Alcohol Use Disorder

Christopher T Rentsch et al. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Current medications for alcohol use disorder (AUD) have limited efficacy and utilization. Some clinical trials have shown efficacy for gabapentin among treatment-seeking individuals. The impact of gabapentin on alcohol consumption in a more general sample remains unknown.

Methods: We identified patients prescribed gabapentin for ≥180 consecutive days for any clinical indication other than substance use treatment between 2009 and 2015 in the Veterans Aging Cohort Study. We propensity-score matched each gabapentin-exposed patient with up to 5 unexposed patients. Multivariable difference-in-difference (DiD) linear regression models estimated the differential change in Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) scores during follow-up between exposed and unexposed patients, by baseline level of alcohol consumption and daily gabapentin dose. Analyses were stratified by AUD history. Clinically meaningful changes were a priori considered a DiD ≥1 point.

Results: Among patients with AUD, AUDIT-C scores decreased 0.39 points (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05, 0.73) more among exposed than unexposed patients (p < 0.03). Potentially clinically meaningful differences were observed among those with AUD and exposed to ≥1,500 mg/d (DiD 0.77, 95% CI 0.15, 1.38, p < 0.02). No statistically significant effects were found among patients with AUD at doses lower than 1,500 mg/d or baseline AUDIT-C ≥4. Among patients without AUD, we found no overall difference in changes in AUDIT-C scores, nor in analyses stratified by baseline level of alcohol consumption.

Conclusions: Patients exposed to doses of gabapentin consistent with those used in clinical trials, particularly those with AUD, experienced a greater decrease in AUDIT-C scores than matched unexposed patients.

Keywords: Alcohol Use Disorder; Electronic Health Records; Gabapentin; Propensity Score.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Distribution of propensity scores in gabapentin exposed and unexposed patients in the full cohort before matching, by alcohol use disorder (AUD) history
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Difference-in-difference estimates and 95% confidence intervals of self-reported changes in AUDIT-C scores associated with gabapentin exposure among non-treatment seeking patients and their propensity-score matched controls, by AUD history, baseline AUDIT-C, and prescribed dose of gabapentin Notes: ** for p<0.05, * for p<0.10; Difference-in-difference = reported AUDIT-C decrease among gabapentin exposed patients minus reported AUDIT-C decrease among propensity-score matched unexposed patients Abbreviations: AUDIT-C - Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test – Consumption; AUD – alcohol use disorder; mg - milligrams

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AKGUN KM, GORDON K, PISANI M, FRIED T, MCGINNIS KA, TATE JP, BUTT AA, GIBERT CL, HUANG L, RODRIGUEZ-BARRADAS MC, RIMLAND D, JUSTICE AC & CROTHERS K 2013. Risk factors for hospitalization and medical intensive care unit (MICU) admission among HIV-infected Veterans. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 62, 52–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. AKGUN KM, TATE JP, CROTHERS K, CRYSTAL S, LEAF DA, WOMACK J, BROWN TT, JUSTICE AC & OURSLER KK 2014. An adapted frailty-related phenotype and the VACS index as predictors of hospitalization and mortality in HIV-infected and uninfected individuals. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 67, 397–404. - PMC - PubMed
    1. AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION 1994. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press.
    1. AUSTIN PC 2011. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies. Multivariate Behav Res, 46, 399–424. - PMC - PubMed
    1. BRADLEY KA, LAPHAM GT, HAWKINS EJ, ACHTMEYER CE, WILLIAMS EC, THOMAS RM & KIVLAHAN DR 2011. Quality concerns with routine alcohol screening in VA clinical settings. J Gen Intern Med, 26, 299–306. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances