Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 7;9(1):17.
doi: 10.3390/ani9010017.

Auditory⁻Visual Matching of Conspecifics and Non-Conspecifics by Dogs and Human Infants

Affiliations

Auditory⁻Visual Matching of Conspecifics and Non-Conspecifics by Dogs and Human Infants

Anna Gergely et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

We tested whether dogs and 14⁻16-month-old infants are able to integrate intersensory information when presented with conspecific and heterospecific faces and vocalisations. The looking behaviour of dogs and infants was recorded with a non-invasive eye-tracking technique while they were concurrently presented with a dog and a female human portrait accompanied with acoustic stimuli of female human speech and a dog's bark. Dogs showed evidence of both con- and heterospecific intermodal matching, while infants' looking preferences indicated effective auditory⁻visual matching only when presented with the audio and visual stimuli of the non-conspecifics. The results of the present study provided further evidence that domestic dogs and human infants have similar socio-cognitive skills and highlighted the importance of comparative examinations on intermodal perception.

Keywords: cross-modal matching; dog; infant; intermodal cognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental stimuli. S1, S2, S3 = silence; V1, V2 = vocalisation (i.e., dog bark/human speech); grey line shows the separation of the two areas of interest (areas of interest (AOI); dog = AOI-D, human = AOI-H).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dogs’ and human infants’ visual preferences as measured by first look/fixation at dog or human images during dog bark or human speech. * p < 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Results of looking duration in dogs (A) and infants (B). * p < 0.05. $ p = 0.09. CI—confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Patterson M.L., Werker J.F. Infants’ ability to match dynamic phonetic and gender information in the face and voice. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 2002;81:93–115. doi: 10.1006/jecp.2001.2644. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spelke E.S. Infants’ intermodal perception of events. Cogn. Psychol. 1976;8:553–560. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(76)90018-9. - DOI
    1. Faragó T., Pongrácz P., Miklósi Á., Huber L., Virányi Z., Range F. Dogs’ expectation about signalers’ body size by virtue of their growls. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e15175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015175. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walker-Andrews A.S., Bahrick L.E., Raglioni S.S., Diaz I. Infants’ bimodal perception of gender. Ecol. Psychol. 1991;3:55–75. doi: 10.1207/s15326969eco0302_1. - DOI
    1. Walker A.S. Intermodal perception of expressive behaviors by human infants. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 1982;13:514–535. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(82)90063-7. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources