Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan 6;11(1):21.
doi: 10.3390/toxins11010021.

Central Effects of Botulinum Neurotoxin-Evidence from Human Studies

Affiliations
Review

Central Effects of Botulinum Neurotoxin-Evidence from Human Studies

David Weise et al. Toxins (Basel). .

Abstract

For more than three decades, Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) has been used to treat a variety of clinical conditions such as spastic or dystonic disorders by inducing a temporary paralysis of the injected muscle as the desired clinical effect. BoNT is known to primarily act at the neuromuscular junction resulting in a biochemical denervation of the treated muscle. However, recent evidence suggests that BoNT's pharmacological properties may not only be limited to local muscular denervation at the injection site but may also include additional central effects. In this review, we report and discuss the current evidence for BoNT's central effects based on clinical observations, neurophysiological investigations and neuroimaging studies in humans. Collectively, these data strongly point to indirect mechanisms via changes to sensory afferents that may be primarily responsible for the marked plastic effects of BoNT on the central nervous system. Importantly, BoNT-related central effects and consecutive modulation and/or reorganization of the brain may not solely be considered "side-effects" but rather an additional therapeutic impact responsible for a number of clinical observations that cannot be explained by merely peripheral actions.

Keywords: Botulinum neurotoxin; central nervous system; dystonia; human studies; spasticity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
T-score maps showing a smaller gray matter volume in long-term BoNT-treated CD patients compared to untreated CD patients. Results are illustrated at an exploratory threshold (voxel-wise p < 0.005, cluster size >100 voxel; * p < 0.05, FWE whole brain corrected on the cluster level) with the corresponding location within the MNI space indicated below.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moore P., Naumann M., editors. Handbook of Botulinum Toxin Treatment. 2nd ed. Blackwell Science; Malden, MA, USA: 2003.
    1. Currà A., Berardelli A. Do the unintended actions of botulinum toxin at distant sites have clinical implications? Neurology. 2009;72:1095–1099. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000345010.98495.fc. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Montecucco C., Schiavo G. Mechanism of action of tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins. Mol. Microbiol. 1994;13:1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00396.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Habermann E., Erdmann G. Pharmacokinetic and histoautoradiographic evidence for the intraaxonal movement of toxin in the pathogenesis of tetanus. Toxicon. 1978;16:611–623. doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(78)90189-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wiegand H., Erdmann G., Wellhöner H.H. 125I-labelled botulinum A neurotoxin: Pharmacokinetics in cats after intramuscular injection. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 1976;292:161–165. doi: 10.1007/BF00498587. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms