Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1988 Nov-Dec;7(6):424-9.

Cytoimmunologic monitoring and heart transplantation

Affiliations
  • PMID: 3062148

Cytoimmunologic monitoring and heart transplantation

C A Hanson et al. J Heart Transplant. 1988 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Cytoimmunologic monitoring (CIM) combines morphological quantitation of activated lymphocytes and immunoblasts with immunophenotyping of peripheral blood in an effort to identify patients at risk for heart transplant rejection. In this study, CIM and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) results were correlated in 55 paired blood and tissue specimens obtained from 18 heart transplant patients after operation. We found that 83% of patients with rejection and 81% of patients without rejection had increased levels of morphological activated lymphocytes. Multiple other criteria for determining levels of activation were used without improving the sensitivity or specificity. The use of CD4:CD8 ratios to discriminate between activation caused by rejection and those from viral infections and other inflammatory conditions yielded a sensitivity of 43% and specificity of 56%. The presence of activation markers such as I2, TAC, and T9 did not correlate with either CIM or EMB findings. CD4:CD8 alone was not predictive of cardiac rejection as increased, normal, and decreased CD4:CD8 ratios were seen in patients with and without rejection. Other measurements such as percentage of activated lymphocytes, total lymphocyte count, and whole blood cell count did not correlate with EMB or immunophenotypic findings. These results indicate that neither CIM, as currently conducted, nor immunophenotyping alone is sensitive or specific enough to substitute for EMB in screening for tissue rejection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Substances

LinkOut - more resources